Discussion: View Thread

PowerPoint and the rhythm of the Classroom

  • 1.  PowerPoint and the rhythm of the Classroom

    Posted 06-06-2001 16:48
    From: Fornaciari, Dr. Charles [mailto:cfornaci@fgcu.edu]

    Hi Everyone,

    I've been following the PowerPoint conversation with quite a bit of interest
    and believe that a number of excellent points have been made concerning its
    use as a pedagogical tool. It's given me a lot to think about and I
    particularly think that William makes an excellent point concerning the type
    of material that we should consider placing on a PowerPoint slide. For items
    like graphs and charts, PowerPoint is often unbeatble while for simple lists
    it can put even the most attentive student to sleep. At my university we
    call it the "click-thud effect": click, the lights go out, thud, the
    students' heads hit the desks.

    I think another issue that I have rarely seen examined is rhythm of the
    classroom and PowerPoint's rule in enhancing or detracting from the rhythm.
    Further, all classroom time can be broken down into two components: time
    where learning is taking place and time where it is not, and I've always
    sought ways to maximize the learning time.

    Most of us know the basics for maximizing learning time through techniques
    like showing up to class 5 minutes early and taking attendance as students
    show up. PowerPoint, and most technology, can be some of the most effective
    killers of learning time and rhythm if not used properly--unfortunately some
    of that is within our control and some of it is not. For example, at my
    university, most classrooms are equiped with a teaching podium that is often
    placed into the front corner of the class. To change the PowerPoint slides,
    you have to walk behind the podium to access the keyboard. Besides the fact
    that there is now a BIG bulk podium separating the professor from the
    student, it is generally not the place that any teacher would choose to
    stand to conduct a class. So, if we're going to teach a PowerPoint enabled
    class, the rhythm becomes: talk, walk to podium (while putting our backs to
    students and probably not speaking or speaking to a wall), look down at
    keyboard, change slide, look up at monitor in podium to make sure it worked
    (still not making eye contact with students) walk back to front and center,
    talk, walk back to podium. In the process of a 1 hour course that winds up
    with a LOT of down time and a very fragmented discussion rhythm.

    Of course, one of our more common results is that many faculty often stay
    behind the podium for the entire class (with all of the psychological
    implications of a large physical barrier between the professor and the
    student). Many of us would like to use an infrared mouse, but at our
    university they are unreliable at best and you still have to be in a certain
    physical position to use it: "Wait, hold on a second, the mouse will change
    the slide. Oppss! It went forward 3 slides. Hold on a second while I try to
    move it back. One slide back. Two slides. Come on, one more slide. Ah, there
    it is. Okay, now what was I saying?" The net result in the above example is
    that not only have we destroyed the rhythm of the class discussion, but
    we've also created a lot of non-learning time (downtime).

    I've been through a number of training seminars as a teacher over the years,
    including receiving quite a bit of instruction as a technical trainer. I'm
    still surprised at how little we consider learning time and rhythm in the
    classroom. Adding PowerPoint and any other technology to the classroom makes
    the issue all the more critical, IMO. My example above is only one way in
    which technology interacts with our learning time and rhythm (I can think of
    many others: "I have this great Web site that will illustrate this point,
    but it appears to be down right now"; until recently we had to completely
    turn out the lights in the classroom order for the PowerPoint presentations
    to be visible--classes in the dark!), but I guess my intended contribution
    to this thread would simply be to suggest that these items become part of
    our thinking when we begin to consider adding any new technology to a
    classroom session.

    Have a good one,

    Charles

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Charles Fornaciari, Ph.D., MCP, MCT Department of Management
    Assistant Professor of Management College of Business
    (941) 590-7384 Florida Gulf Coast University
    E-mail: cfornaci@fgcu.edu 10501 FGCU Blvd. South
    http://itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/cfornaci Ft. Myers, FL 33965-6565
    "He who would do good to another must do it in Minute Particulars. General
    Good is the plea of the scoundrel, hypocrite, and flatterer. " William Blake