Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Improve the Interview Process for Applicants

    Posted 11-30-1998 10:22
    As I have gone through the interview process for awhile now, I was stuck by the
    fact most of the questions I am asked are focused on past performances or duties
    and not how I would use those skills or abilities address current or future
    assignments. Metaphorically, hiring people using this line of reasoning is like
    trying to drive your car while only looking in the rear-view mirror.

    So when I saw Dr. Sullivan's process for interviewing, I asked his permission to
    send this along because I thought others might find it refreshing and benefit
    from what he suggests as an interview process oriented toward the future.

    Note: My web address
    http://home.att.net/~Choragus
    __________________________________
    Great Optimism,

    Dutch Driver
    Abilene, TX 79605
    mailto:AskChoragus@yada-yada.com
    _____________________________________________________________________

    Rethinking Interviews - The "Fut R View": A Better Way To Hire

    By Dr. John Sullivan

    Friday, November 20, 1998
    _____________________________________________________________________

    Most interview strategies were developed long before the "Internet" age when the
    speed of change in business was
    rather slow. However, if your business is in a rapidly-changing environment, you
    will need new tools
    that can tell you more about the future possibilities of a candidate than what
    they did years ago. Does your
    business require "outside-the-box" solutions that didn't exist 3-5 years ago?
    Are you looking to excite applicants
    and send them a message that your firm is different? If so, you might consider a
    new approach to hiring called a
    "Fut R View."

    WHAT IS A FUT R VIEW?

    A Fut R View is an advanced interview technique for IT, product development, and
    other forward-looking jobs. In a
    Fut R View the focus is on assessing applicants' new ideas and their
    competencies in planning, forecasting, and
    solving future problems your firm will face under the unique constraints of your
    culture and your business
    environment. Fut R Views work best for cutting edge jobs and for selecting
    innovators and the "very best" in their
    fields. They are not for every job. They can, however, be a supplement to
    existing interviews or used as a
    stand-alone tool. Fut R Views emphasize the forward-thinking whereas behavioral,
    as well as most other
    interviews focus on the past.

    REASONS FOR USING A FUT R VIEW TO GAIN A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN HIRING:

    * You can't beat the competition in hiring the best candidates if you use the
    same tools as the competitors to
    screen your candidates.

    * If you want to continually improve your selection process, you must try new
    tools to change your results. A Fut R View is another approach that will give
    SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT ANSWERS and information than traditional interviews.

    * Fut R Views excite and challenge "fast change" workers who need to be excited
    in order to accept a job. These
    fast-change types (as well as GenXer's) judge a company by the "WOW's" they see
    in their company's recruiting and
    selection process. They are often bored with resumes and standard interviews.
    Fut R Views send a clear message that
    our firm is different and future-focused. You can't get "the best" unless you
    stand out from the competitors. Fut R
    Views excite those that live for the future and conversely it can also
    "unsettle" those who live in the past.

    * A further advantage of Fut R Views is that after the interviews are over you
    have multiple, diverse, and "fresh
    eyes" forecasts and answers (sometimes you even get answers from your
    competitors) to your problems. The answers alone could be priceless, even if no
    one is hired. Few ever bother to document the answers to behavioral interviews,
    no less use the results as valuable "data." Fut R Views give you usable answers
    and new approaches to consider.

    * Screening tools that give us new and different useful information allow us to
    improve the quality of hire! Quality
    hires might include agile, future thinkers, "envelope pushers," problem solvers,
    speed learners, etc.

    POSSIBLE PROBLEMS WITH TRADITIONAL APPROACHES TO INTERVIEWING INCLUDE:

    * Most screening devices (behavioral interviews, resumes, references, etc.) are
    "past focused." They dwell on
    experiences that may be years old and reflect how a candidate acted under a set
    of circumstances that are
    almost certainly different than your organization will face in the future.

    * Behavioral interviews ask you how you acted in the past, but they fail to ask
    you how YOU WOULD HAVE ACTED if you
    had the freedom to use your own approach. Applicants are not asked if the
    approach they followed was their own or
    if it might have been under someone else's orders. In a Fut R View, applicants
    are asked to develop their own
    approach. They are given the freedom to make bad decisions as well as good ones.

    * Behavioral interviews ask questions about how you acted in the culture of your
    old firm rather than how would you
    do it in our culture (and business environment).

    * Behavioral interviewing questions (and answer outlines) are widely available,
    making preparation and "practicing"
    relatively easy.

    * In behavioral interviewing you would ask a veteran general how he/she fought
    their last war, while Fut R
    Viewing would ask them both, how they would do it today, and ask for their plan
    for forecasting and winning a
    future war.

    * If competencies are measured in a behavioral interview they are probably
    "dated" and based on "what competencies
    'resulted in success' in the past." You may be able to avoid this "past bias" by
    identifying the competencies a
    firm will need in the future and assessing these new competencies in a Fut R
    View.

    * The two different types of interviews would get different answers because the
    past is not always a predictor of the
    future, and the way we did it "then" might not be the way we would do it
    tomorrow. If you assume a rapid rate of
    change (like in high tech firms) what you did as little as one year ago may
    already be ancient history!

    PREPARATION FOR THE FUT R VIEW

    * Interview/survey your top performers in the targeted jobs to identify what
    your best employees see as the most
    difficult current and future issues, problems and opportunities facing the
    job/firm. They would also be asked
    to contribute an outline of the best, average, and unacceptable answers that
    would be used as guidelines for
    assessing the candidates. For a Fut R View to be most successful, you must make
    sure the problems given to the
    applicants are ones that the best applicants can solve and the "average" can
    not. You should also "pre-test" your
    problems and solutions with your best technical performers to make sure you know
    for sure that the best will ace it
    and the worst will fail it.

    * Prior to a Fut R View you have two options.
    1. Under the first option you notify the candidates in advance of the Fut R View
    that they are expected to research the company (and it's environment) and to be
    prepared to outline how they would forecast/solve our problems (or take
    advantage of our opportunities).

    2. Under the second option (for positions where research and forecasting skills
    are less important) you supply all
    candidates with a brief 1-page summary describing our culture and our problems/
    opportunities.

    STEPS IN A FUT R VIEW:

    Note: Be prepared to video/audio tape (with permission) the session or to take
    good notes in order to "capture" their
    answers

    1. At the beginning of the Fut R View, you welcome the candidate and outline the
    goals and steps of the process.
    Answer any questions they have.

    2. Next the candidate is generally asked to identify the potential problems they
    would anticipate during their first
    month on the job (if they get them wrong you can identify the actual problems
    for them). You then ask them to walk
    you through the steps (and the why's) for solving these first month problems.

    3. The next step (optional) involves giving them an outline/process map for some
    of the key processes/ systems
    they would be responsible for managing or using. They would then be asked
    questions on (1) How they would improve /
    modify the systems, (2) What are the critical success factors for a world class
    system, and (3) What are the
    common problems/errors with these systems.

    4. The Final step of a Fut R View involves asking the candidate to forecast the
    next 1-2 years for (1) the job,
    (2) the needs of the business, and (3) the critical success factors for your
    industry.

    5. Other possible options include:
    * Asking them to outline their self-development and learning plan for the first
    year
    * Asking them for their ideas on how, through their job, we can help us gain a
    competitive advantage over our
    competitors
    * Asking them to critique our firms latest solution/ideas
    * Asking them to forecast functional and industry essential competencies for the
    next 2 years and show which ones they
    have
    * As a substitute to Fut R Views try "Simuviews" (interviews where the applicant
    is put through several verbal
    simulations about how to solve the current problems to be faced in the job at
    our company)

    6. Rate the applicants on the ability to accurately forecast,
    solve short- and long-term problems and on their overall view of the future as
    it relates to our vision and needs. Compare them to other candidates. Also
    compare Fut R View scores with the scores on their traditional interviews to see
    the superiority of the tool. Allow others who couldn't make the Fut R View
    session to "view the tape" and evaluate the candidate.

    7. Remember with Fut R Views you get the ideas/plans of all of the interviewees.
    This intelligence has a value of it's
    own, regardless of who you hire.
    ______________________________________________________________________

    Dr John Sullivan is head of the Human Resource Management Program at San
    Francisco State University. He is a well-known international speaker, author and
    advisor to Fortune 500 and Silicon Valley firms. He is also head of
    the HR Strategic Forecasting Project, whose goal is to forecast and anticipate
    HR issues. (E-mail questions or
    comments to mailto:JohnS@sfsu.edu)
    ______________________________________________________________________

    Please support our sponsors. Their patronage keeps these columns free!
    ______________________________________________________________________

    For the latest news about the employment industry, with info on
    layoffs, the labor shortage and groundbreaking new products, visit
    http://www.erexchange.com/
    ______________________________________________________________________

    To join an e-mail conversation between over 1,800 recruiters, join
    the Electronic Recruiting Discussion List!
    http://www.erexchange.com/erdl.html
    ______________________________________________________________________

    * List Publisher ----> David Manaster
    mailto:david@erexchange.com
    * Subscribe ---------> mailto:join-daily@ere.erexchange.com
    * Unsubscribe -------> mailto:unjoin-daily@ere.erexchange.com
    * Personal Settings -> http://um2.unitymail.com/Unity/ctrlpanel/0/35/116
    * Home Page ---------> http://www.erexchange.com/


  • 2.  Improve the Interview Process for Applicants

    Posted 11-30-1998 11:07
    Dutch Driver <Choragus@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

    >So when I saw Dr. Sullivan's process for
    interviewing, I asked his permission to
    send this along because I thought others might
    find it refreshing and benefit from what he
    suggests as an interview process oriented toward the future.

    Rethinking Interviews - The "Fut R View": A Better Way To Hire<

    so I thought I would remind everyone that Dr. John Sullivan's
    official web page is located at our web site.

    We have 36 of Dr. Sullivan's articles posted for your reading pleasure.

    While you are at our web site be sure to read how 20,000 companies have
    already substantially improved their selection/interview process by using
    the concept of job matching.

    To visit Dr. Sullivan's web page go to:

    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/gately/welcome.htm

    and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page for finding
    Dr. Sullivan's web page.

    Sincerely,

    Robert F. Gately, PE, MBA
    GATELY CONSULTING
    (800) 478-8117


  • 3.  Improve the Interview Process for Applicants

    Posted 11-30-1998 22:05
    >7. Remember with Fut R Views you get the ideas/plans of all of the
    interviewees.
    >This intelligence has a value of it's
    >own, regardless of who you hire.

    While I agree wholeheartedly with most of the Sullivan posting, that last
    item about business intelligence snagged my attention. I've had reports
    from candidates who feel that this aspect of the process is unethical and
    legally dubious. One of my best students refused earlier this year to
    proceed with an interview on just this point, feeling that the recruiting
    organization (which apparently really wanted to hire him) was trying to
    take too much advantage of the situation for a bunch of free consulting.

    In a world in which competitive intelligence and corporate ethics are
    increasingly important, I urge more thinking about how much of one's real
    strategic process we should be revealing in such interviews (often with
    candidates who will also be interviewing with one's competitors), and on
    how much business value we should be trying to mine from people who are
    only volunteer candidates at this stage of the process.


    +/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+/+
    Prof. Thomas A. Bryant, Ph.D., Visiting Professor and
    State of New Jersey Chair in Small Business & Entrepreneurship
    Faculty of Management, MEC 326
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    111 Washington Avenue, NEWARK, NJ 07102-3027 U.S.A.
    Tel: (973) 353-1062; Fax: (973) 353-1664
    e-mail: tabryant@andromeda.rutgers.edu


  • 4.  Improve the Interview Process for Applicants

    Posted 12-03-1998 01:27
    Like Professor Bryant, I too was somewhat intrigued by the response that
    companies use real examples during the interviewing process. My surprise,
    however, was twofold. Like Professor Bryant, I was surprised that companies
    would attempt to use information solicited from interviewed candidates
    regarding real company problems. In addition, I was surprised that they
    would use real company problems, knowing that the candidate would probably
    also be interviewed by competing firms. As a job candidate I would
    reconstruct any example as a hypothetical example and thus get through the
    interview without having provided any information that the interviewing firm
    could use to their advantage in the event I was not hired. As the
    representative of the interviewing firm, I would raise hypothetical
    problems, rather than real ones, for hypothetical problems would reveal a
    more general kind of response such that it would give me a better sense of
    whether the candidate would be able to handle issues that could arise. This
    approach would not only protect the interests, it would be to the advantage
    of both the candidate and the firm. The principle behind this is that
    mutually beneficial interaction generally leaves all parties to the
    interaction better off. The FUT R Views approach is not optimal and thus
    leaves some party to the interaction potentially worse off. No rational
    agent would voluntarily participate in such interaction.

    Regards,

    Dr. Kenneth F.T. Cust
    Philosophical Services
    607 S.E. 150 Road
    Warrensburg, MO 64093
    Phone: (660) 429-6267
    Web Page: http://philosophical-services.com