Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  What Goals Should a Leadership Development Program

    Posted 01-16-1997 22:58
    Having been a student in, a preceptor of, & an observer of leadership
    development programs, I have decided they generally are little more than
    glorified problem-solving exercises.

    At TAMU, the students were esentially unpaid consultants for community
    service outlets, or an entity of either city, county, and state
    governments. The student groups researched a current problem then
    reported their recommendations to their "sponsor" group's liasion officer.
    After having to deal with restricted access to the information and
    resource people, the student group's present the sponsor with their
    recommendations based on their research and ability to digest and solve
    the problem.

    In some feedback I culled from a number of the students involved, I
    learned that there were little or no feedback on whether the
    recommendations were even implemented. The students felt like it was a
    waste of time because the sponsor group gave them high marks for their
    efforts with comments along these lines, "I think you college students
    have done a wonderful job, and yada yada yada, we will take your
    recommendations into consideration, but yada, yada, yada." The students
    indicated the patronizing attitude from the members of the sponsoring
    group was more than a little irksome to them.

    I do believe that students need problem-solving skills, but I also believe
    that every class presents students with the challenges necessary to
    develop problem-solving skills and learning to make good decisions.

    HOWEVER, leadership is much more complex than making decisions and
    solving-problems. Leadership is the exercise of influence in many
    different forms to get to form a group who share the need to get things
    done. Leadership is doling out rewards and punishment, praise and
    neglect, and naming the values of the group and using those values to
    achieve a desired effect. It is persuasion, begging, threatening, but
    most of all it is selecting what needs to be done and beginning,
    initiating, exciting others to go along with the idea. Here
    leadership becomes visionary and strategic---

    I almost hate to say it, but problem-solving is more in line with
    management than leadership. And, I will go further--a person is either a
    leader or not. I do not allow for a fudging of the lines with terms like
    "leadership skills" and "management skills." If these are different sets,
    then the people who use them effectively are are also different.

    Whew! This idea of leadership development is one of my hot buttons.

    ______________________
    Great Optimism,

    Dutch Driver
    Dept. of Communication
    McMurry University
    Abilene, TX
    ddriver@cs1.mcm.edu


  • 2.  What Goals Should a Leadership Development Program

    Posted 01-17-1997 08:39
    On Fri, 17 Jan 1997, Michele Grottola wrote:

    > Dutch Driver wrote:
    > >I almost hate to say it, but problem-solving is more in line with
    > >management than leadership. And, I will go further--a person is either a
    > >leader or not. I do not allow for a fudging of the lines with terms like
    > >"leadership skills" and "management skills." If these are different sets,
    > >then the people who use them effectively are are also different.

    /clipped/

    > About the above paragraph, I have a few questions: What do you
    > really mean when you say you believe that "a person is either a leader or
    > not?" I ask this because I'm afraid that you are returning us to the older
    > theories of "trait leadership" rather than addressing what I think are very
    > important concepts to employ with all students, namely that leadership is a
    > "behavior" that can and should be engendered in as many organizational
    > members as possible.

    No. I did not mean a return to "trait" leadership theory, but I
    also object to the theories of situational leadership because they are
    post-problem-centered, that is they do not address how to or who
    identifies that there is a problem, threat, or challenge to the group,
    organization, or culture. My belief is that it is a cognitive shift on
    the part of an individual to become a leader. A few years back, Ken Burns
    did a documentary about baseball where I got this quote that I think
    expresses the cognitive shift necessary to become a leader.

    Do you remember being in left field? Thinking to yourself--`Don't
    hit the ball to me. Don't hit the ball to me.'

    I believe that there is a fundemental change in a kid's life when
    that thought changes into `Hit the ball to me. I want the ball.
    Hit it to me.'

    Paraphrased from Jody Powell on PBS' documentary "Baseball"

    Sports metaphors are so pat, but they occasionally carry a wallop
    that just knocks you over.

    ______________________
    Great Optimism,

    Dutch Driver
    Dept. of Communication
    McMurry University
    Abilene, TX
    ddriver@cs1.mcm.edu