Discussion: View Thread

Expand all | Collapse all

(no subject)

Archive User

Archive User11-13-1998 18:04

Archive User

Archive User12-01-1998 13:25

Archive User

Archive User11-29-1999 12:50

Archive User

Archive User11-29-1999 12:52

  • 1.  (no subject)

    Posted 01-22-1997 03:50
    DELETE MG-ED-DV gpamental@GROG.RIC.EDU PW=MED


  • 2.  (no subject)

    Posted 12-12-1997 10:00
     
    OrgCoach wrote:

    I am doign some coaching and training for executives and managers, on
    presentation skills.  I thought I'd spruce up some of what I have been doing,
    with perhaps some video-clips.  (Yes, I've kept the "how do you get permission
    to use these in the classroom" tips!)

    Any suggestions, ideas?  I'm looking, especially, for videos of great
    presenters, lousy presenters, mistakes, funnies, fantastic role models...

    Andrea
     

    I have been an advisor to Players Workshop of Chicago, a school of improvisational theater (in fact, the oldest continuous school here in the States), and taking classes there as well.  We have melded improv techniques with straight "platform skills" (e.g., "don't turn your back to the audience -- they might think you are ready to leave the room") as well as pre-and post video playbacks of their actual presentations.  You might want to consider something similar for your group either with Players or with a local group.

    To illustrate what I mean .... When a person looks at a tape of themselves, they tend to focus on how they look, sound, etc.  What they generally do not consider is how they perceive their audience.  In our Workshop we have people make a presentation as if to a roomful of children, gangsters, people who have been up all night drinking, etc.  The effect on the presenter is to become aware of the implicit assumptions they make about their audiences (e.g., "the enemy", "empty heads needing filling", etc.), have fun with imagining them differently, be able to "warm" up their style, etc.

    If you are interested, I would be happy to put you in touch with the person at Players Workshop who really knows about this stuff.

                                                                                            Bernie
    --
    Bernard Liebowitz, PhD
    Advisor & Consultant
         to Business & Management
    980 No. Michigan Ave., Ste. 1400
    Chicago, Il  60611
    tel} 773/334-2003
    fax} 773/334-2004
    email} bernie@liebowitzassoc.com
    http:// www.liebowitzassoc.com
     



  • 3.  (no subject)

    Posted 03-03-1998 18:56
    Patrick S.W.Fong wrote:


    > Recently I am looking into an area (without knowing what specific
    > terms to
    > look for) by examining the situation of taking ideas / concepts from
    > one
    > field and applied to a totally different field. For example, a concept
    > or
    > idea taken from management, business or even industrial engineering
    > and
    > apply to construction management.
    >
    >
    I am not sure what terms would yield the type of information you want,
    but there are several excellent sources
    that reflect a great deal of creativity in metaphorically applying a
    concept from one field to another. The "target" in
    these examples is "organizational structure" since that is my area of
    interest.

    Brian Pentland had an article posted on a website (I don't have the
    address nor his current school affiliation) that
    was excellent, a real "out-of-the-box" thinking exercise -- it was
    entitled, "Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes". Another
    fascinating work is a book by Gareth Morgan, "Images of Organizations",
    in which he uses such models as "organism", "brain", "political system",
    "psyche", etc., to ferret out what thinking in these ways about
    organizations might reveal about organizations. Another fascinating book
    is "Organizations as Theatre: A Social Psychology of Dramatic
    Appearances", the title
    being self-explanatory.

    A theory of metaphor is outlined in "Metaphors We Live By", co-authored
    by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. This book
    may be of interest to you in that it demonstrates how so much of our
    language is indeed metaphoric. Using this as a stimulant,
    I would suggest that you read virtually any article or book in your
    "target field", select metaphors that are used (frequently
    or not), determine what field of study they come from and apply the
    models in that field to your area of interest. Also, you
    might take any model (e.g., some of the ones mentioned above) and have
    fun applying it to your "target" to see what might
    happen.

    --
    Bernard Liebowitz, PhD
    Advisor & Consultant to Business & Management
    980 No. Michigan Ave., Ste. 1400
    Chicago, Il 60611
    tel} 773/334-2003
    fax} 773/334-2004
    email} bernie@liebowitzassoc.com
    http:// www.liebowitzassoc.com


  • 4.  (no subject)

    Posted 09-02-1998 07:29
    I have lost the instruction to unsubscibe ..... could someone please
    post them to me at honeyd@tempest.com.au

    Many thanks......


  • 5.  (no subject)

    Posted 11-13-1998 18:04
    unsubscribe


  • 6.  (no subject)

    Posted 12-01-1998 13:25
    unsubscribe MG-ED-DV list


  • 7.  (no subject)

    Posted 12-03-1998 13:54
    i need to unsubscribe -- could someone advise how to do this.

    thank you.


  • 8.  (no subject)

    Posted 09-13-1999 00:01
    Call for Papers
    Seventh Annual International Conference on
    Advances in Management

    This conference will be held at the Marriott Hotel at Colorado Springs,
    Colorado on July 12-15, 2000. The Call for Papers for the conference can be
    found at:

    http://members.aol.com/icam2000/call2000.htm/


  • 9.  (no subject)

    Posted 11-29-1999 12:50
    unsubscribe maria e. joiner


  • 10.  (no subject)

    Posted 11-29-1999 12:52
    unsubscribe maria e. joiner


  • 11.  (no subject)

    Posted 04-05-2002 07:47
    Hi everyone,

    Two questions for the group:

    1) If core leadership behaviors like vision, decision-making, communication,
    and results focus are considered to be soft skills, then how do you define
    "softer" skills such as emotional intelligence, fairness, and developing
    employees? I've heard the latter set referred to as "intangibles" of
    leadership. How do you refer to concepts such as these?

    2) I'm looking for a stat on how satisfied the general population is with
    their work/job. Can anyone direct me to a good survey? A survey conducted
    by the popular media (such as CNN) or even the Gallup organization would be
    great!

    Thank you,

    Travis Bradberry
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Hi Travis:

    What are the hard skills, soft skills, and leadership skills?

    Your soft skills are "managerial" skills at the strategic, operational and
    tactical levels. Leadership skills to me include your softer skills and much
    more. LMX leadership theory is clear on this point. Hard skills are those
    needed to do the professional tasks, e.g., engineering, production,
    marketing, and law. Soft skills are those needed to work with other people
    cooperatively, e.g., planning, decision making, communications, and
    negotiations. Leadership skills are those required to influence commitment
    to the mission, e.g., LMX and charisma.

    For what its worth,

    G-Bear

    /jag
    PLEASE NOTE AREA CODE CHANGE
    George Graen, Ph.D.
    University of Louisiana at Lafayette
    Management Department
    (479) 631-9394
    (479) 631-9365
    lmxlotus@aol.com


  • 12.  (no subject)

    Posted 07-05-2002 13:56
    Conna,

    Leadership effectiveness depends on the marriage of leaders and followers.
    According to LMX theory of leadership, leaders possess hard skills
    (technology), soft skills (cooperation and interpersonal), and leadership
    skills (LMX and charisma). They can be gifted or challenged on each of these
    skills. Followers possess hard skills (technology) soft skills (cooperation
    and interpersonal), and followership skills (LMX and charisma). They also
    can be gifted or challenged on these. Effective marriages produce powerful
    processes and fruitful outcomes.

    With low skills on technology, the building falls down. With low skills on
    cooperation and interpersonal relations, the building never gets finished.
    With low skills leadership/followership, the company falls down.

    If one side of the dyad has the relevant quality of skills, it can muddle
    through, but if both have it, they can do great things under the most
    stressful conditions, given an effective marriage.

    Yes, it takes leaders' right stuff, followers' right stuff, and a
    relationship with the right stuff to create synergy.

    If either company teacher or university teacher doesn't understand this, I'm
    sorry but he or she is lost.

    George

    /jag
    George Graen, Ph.D.
    University of Louisiana Lafayette
    Management Department
    (479) 631-9394
    (479) 631-9365 (Fax)
    lmxlotus@aol.com


  • 13.  (no subject)

    Posted 07-08-2002 13:02
    Christopher,

    It appears that leadership like Elvis is dead, but the legend lives!

    Much of what we call "leadership" is more accurately described as a part of a
    "network of partnerships". When we narrow our perspective to direct
    reporting relationships, we truncate such networks and focus on Leader-Member
    Exchanges (LMX). When we change our field to include peers with the same
    direct report, we focus on Member-Member Exchanges (MMX). When we expand
    further to include the entire work group, we focus on Team-Member Exchanges
    (TMX). Finally, when we expand to include the entire workplace network of a
    person, we focus on the workplace partnership networks (WPN).

    Workplace partnership is defined as negotiated, reciprocal and incremental
    influence between people engaged in an interdependent activity. It is
    created through a process of partnership making by which the respective
    partner roles and relationships emerge. The fundamental unit for this
    process is dyadic or two-person, although larger units are possible. Through
    this process the parties define their roles in terms of duties and
    responsibilities in the partnership and develop their relationship with
    partner in terms of trust, respect and commitment. Once these fundamental
    partnerships are developed they can be assembled into larger networks. There
    networks are the drivers of synergy (aggregated incremental influence) and
    serve to transform job holders into team players.

    In this perspective the role of leader is problematic. It is not necessarily
    the person with the highest rank in the organization. One must study the
    partnership networks in operation to discover the functional leaders.
    Moreover, these leaders may change over time and activity.

    When we only focus on unit heads and their direct report partnerships, we
    find LMX and attribute leadership to some of the unit heads. When we only
    focus on direct report partnerships we find MMX and attribute leadership to
    some partners. When we only focus on work groups we find TMX and attribute
    leadership so some of the teams. Finally, when we focus on an entire
    network, we find variance from richly articulated and elaborate networks to
    poorly defined and truncated ones. But who is the network leader?

    Is leadership a characteristic of individuals? dyads? triads, work groups?
    networks? The answer is yes. At any level, the partnership process can
    generate the incremental influence that we call "synergy". After 35 years of
    researching this powerful process at its many levels in organizations, we
    have concluded that the process underlying face to face leadership is that
    which develops partnership networks. Once a partnership network
    characterized by strong and reciprocal relationships of trust, respect, and
    commitment is developed, potential synergy exists, but must find a focus.
    The person in the most visible position often gets labeled the "leader" by
    outside observers. Insiders understand that their synergy was due to their
    combined sacrifices in the name of partnership with their network comrades.

    We ceased looking for such "heroic leaders" long ago, and instead we searched
    for people who developed these partnership networks. These were the creators
    of synergy potential. People who develop these partnerships under the most
    adverse conditions tend to be successful in organizations throughout their
    careers. This was shown by our 30-year career management panel and over a
    hundred other LMX investigations.

    One thing is clear. If you seek to be seen as a leader in your organization,
    build, inherit or fall into a well developed partnership network. Most folks
    are forced to build their own while the others must win the lottery to
    inherit or fall into the opportunity. Fortunately, we know a good deal about
    the technology for building your own partnership network. However, when you
    do, don't be surprised if someone else is called your leader now and again,
    but in the end you'll be recognized. We hope.

    George
    /jag
    George Graen, Ph.D.
    University of Louisiana Lafayette
    Management Department
    (479) 631-9394
    (479) 631-9365 (Fax)
    lmxlotus@aol.com


  • 14.  (no subject)

    Posted 07-30-2002 11:54
    Colleagues,

    I have written a trade book about leadership as building team partnerships.
    This would be compatible with Ed's ROTC case. I agree with Ed that
    leadership may emphasize building partnerships (cooperation) or MVPs
    (competition), and teams win on partnerships.

    BTW, does anyone have the name and address of a trade book agent that you
    could recommend? I'm look for a good one.

    Thanks.

    George
    /jag
    George Graen, Ph.D.
    University of Louisiana Lafayette
    Management Department
    (479) 631-9394
    (479) 631-9365 (Fax)
    lmxlotus@aol.com


  • 15.  (no subject)

    Posted 10-28-2002 14:08
    Dear Dr. Graen:

    I am a management/leadership-development consultant (see attached bio)
    who is scheduled to teach a leadership course beginning in January (see
    attached syllabus). As you can see from the syllabus, I would like to
    extensively cover leader-member exchange theory during the course.

    During the course, I would like to have the students "experience" your
    theory in addition to learning about it on a cognitive level. Do you
    have any advice for me as to how I would accomplish my experiential goal?
    Can you recommend some experiential exercises? Instruments?

    Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

    Joseph L. Curtin
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dear Mr. Curtin,

    Thank you very much for your interest in LMX theory.

    I suggest that you assign your student's to study groups with an assigned
    leader and instruct the leader to transform as many of his group into his
    partners. To make it realistic, assign some of the group to play "loners"
    who only want to do their written part and assign some to play the "willing
    partners" who seek to do more and make the group successful. Carefully
    debrief and instruct in LMX theory.

    Good Luck!

    Regards,

    George
    /jag
    George Graen, Ph.D.
    Professor of International Leadership
    University of Louisiana Lafayette
    B.I. Moody III College of Business Administration
    (479) 631-9394
    (479) 631-9365 (Fax)
    lmxlotus@aol.com


  • 16.  (no subject)

    Posted 12-13-2004 13:47
    Fred asks for process. My favorite was in my book Unwritten Rules (1989,
    Wiley, Chapter 7) “Solve Problems”. My three stage process is below.
    Stage 1: Problem Finding
    (a) Generate alternatives
    (b) Evaluate alternatives
    (c) Select best set
    Stage 2: Solution Making
    (a) Generate
    (b) Evaluate
    (c) Select

    Stage 3: Solution Implementing
    (a) Generate
    (b) Evaluate
    (c) Select
    (d) Pray (optional)

    Note 1: Michael Ayers’ exact format is part of my Stage 1.
    Note 2: I find that cultural difference apply in that the Eastern
    bias is to overweight Stage 1 and underweight Stage 2 compared to the Western
    bias.
    Comments welcome on my complete creative problem solving process in Unwritten
    Rules, English, French, Spanish or Chinese.

    George Graen
    /jag
    "Love individuals and despise groups"
    George Carlin, 2004 HBO, "40 years"


  • 17.  (no subject)

    Posted 01-19-2005 06:53
    Shelly,

    Nice statement for JAP content and process. I suggest in addition:
    1) Does the paper contribute anything new?
    2) Is it worth publishing?
    3) Is it technically correct?
    4) Is it self-serving?
    5) Is JAP the best outlet?
    6) Is it completely analyzed and interpreted?
    7) Are author(s) fooling themselves or us?

    George Graen
    /jag


  • 18.  (no subject)

    Posted 01-26-2005 10:09
    Dear Colleagues,

    Mary Uhl-Bien and I are undertaking a meta-analysis of LMX research written
    since Gerstner and Day's (1997) meta-analysis in JAP. Are you aware of any
    unpublished papers on the subject that we might include? Thanks for your help.

    George Graen
    /jag


  • 19.  (no subject)

    Posted 02-25-2012 10:10
    Colleagues,
     
    This is a worthy project. I hope that more of you will sign on to write textbooks. I will help with the Leadership text, but I am too old to write one. I personally support this effort. Thank you very much,
     
    Cheers,
     
    George
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/24/2012 9:40:22 P.M. Central Standard Time, chad@albrechtfamily.com writes:
    On another note, we have more than 20 authors currently writing various business textbooks that will all be available for free over the next 2 years.  We still don't have anyone authoring a leadership textbook and would be very interested in having one.  If you have any interest in writing one, please let me know.  

    Within days of releasing our first textbook, over 40 institutions had adopted the text in more than 15 countries. I believe that with the upgrade there will be substantial revenue for authors.  However, even without the financial rewards, we estimate that our books will have a major influence in business schools throughout the world. 

    Thanks again,

    Chad

    On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Chad Albrecht <chad@albrechtfamily.com> wrote:
    Dear George, 

    Thanks so much for the information.  We really appreciate all of your help and support.  As you are one of the leaders in the field, I was just worried that people would see your email and blow off the entire effort.  To be honest, I'm not sure why Simon and Tony didn't include your leadership theory as well as several other theories.  I will work with them to get the book through another revision that incorporates this information. 

    Thanks again,

    Chad


    On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:11 AM, <Lmxlotus@aol.com> wrote:
    Oxford University Press, Handbook of Leadership Overview of Future Research Directions for Team Leadership  attached.
     
    George Graen