Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Better Listings from Less Chivalry

    Posted 02-19-1997 00:32
    Today, my weekend e-mail contained 80+ listings from MG-ED-DV.
    That's a lot to work off. And I have to suspect that there are highly
    desirable list participants who give up on us, because they can't see
    enough time coming available to ever let them wade through the incoming
    flood of MED musings. Here though is a proposal for at least a small
    improvement.
    I note in my backlog of 80 e-mails, that about 5% were naught but
    messages of affirmation (e.g., "I agree with Jim." (Or Meg, or Jean, or
    ... etc.)). And while it's nice to be appreciated, it would help to cut the
    clutter (at least by 5%) if such words-of-support went privately to their
    deserving recipients, rather than being broadcast into the e-mail boxes of
    several thousand less-than-fascinated list subscribers.
    I've saved *my 5%, now. Anybody got any gigantic schemes for saving
    us from the other 95%?


  • 2.  Better Listings from Less Chivalry

    Posted 02-19-1997 09:07
    Thanks, Fred, for you analysis of the e-mail load. I am struggling
    between struggling through it and signing off, thereby losing some useful
    stuff. I have several other strategies to suggest:
    1) Carefully consider the "Subject" line--if it says "Teams" and is really
    about teams and I am not interested in team, I can skip over it. However,
    if it is a new subject, I might want to browse.
    2) Ask ourselves whether what we have to say really contributes
    information.
    3) Give some thought to articulating messages as briefly as possible--as a
    trained writer, I know that this requires more time for the author.
    Hoping to stay on-line.
    Ruth

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ruth H. Axelrod, Doctoral Candidate | How come when I want a
    Organizational Behavior and Development | set of hands I get a
    The George Washington University | human being as well?
    (H) 301-593-4938 |
    11372 Baroque Road, Silver Spring, MD 20901 | Attributed to Henry Ford
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, FRED P. ANDERSON; DEPT. OF MGMT.& MKTG. wrote:

    > Today, my weekend e-mail contained 80+ listings from MG-ED-DV.
    > That's a lot to work off. And I have to suspect that there are highly
    > desirable list participants who give up on us, because they can't see
    > enough time coming available to ever let them wade through the incoming
    > flood of MED musings. Here though is a proposal for at least a small
    > improvement.
    > I note in my backlog of 80 e-mails, that about 5% were naught but
    > messages of affirmation (e.g., "I agree with Jim." (Or Meg, or Jean, or
    > ... etc.)). And while it's nice to be appreciated, it would help to cut the
    > clutter (at least by 5%) if such words-of-support went privately to their
    > deserving recipients, rather than being broadcast into the e-mail boxes of
    > several thousand less-than-fascinated list subscribers.
    > I've saved *my 5%, now. Anybody got any gigantic schemes for saving
    > us from the other 95%?
    >


  • 3.  Better Listings from Less Chivalry

    Posted 02-19-1997 09:44
    If you can't handle the heat ..... (well you know)


    Ruth H. Axelrod wrote:
    >
    > Thanks, Fred, for you analysis of the e-mail load. I am struggling
    > between struggling through it and signing off, thereby losing some useful
    > stuff. I have several other strategies to suggest:
    > 1) Carefully consider the "Subject" line--if it says "Teams" and is really
    > about teams and I am not interested in team, I can skip over it. However,
    > if it is a new subject, I might want to browse.
    > 2) Ask ourselves whether what we have to say really contributes
    > information.
    > 3) Give some thought to articulating messages as briefly as possible--as a
    > trained writer, I know that this requires more time for the author.
    > Hoping to stay on-line.
    > Ruth
    >
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Ruth H. Axelrod, Doctoral Candidate | How come when I want a
    > Organizational Behavior and Development | set of hands I get a
    > The George Washington University | human being as well?
    > (H) 301-593-4938 |
    > 11372 Baroque Road, Silver Spring, MD 20901 | Attributed to Henry Ford
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, FRED P. ANDERSON; DEPT. OF MGMT.& MKTG. wrote:
    >
    > > Today, my weekend e-mail contained 80+ listings from MG-ED-DV.
    > > That's a lot to work off. And I have to suspect that there are highly
    > > desirable list participants who give up on us, because they can't see
    > > enough time coming available to ever let them wade through the incoming
    > > flood of MED musings. Here though is a proposal for at least a small
    > > improvement.
    > > I note in my backlog of 80 e-mails, that about 5% were naught but
    > > messages of affirmation (e.g., "I agree with Jim." (Or Meg, or Jean, or
    > > ... etc.)). And while it's nice to be appreciated, it would help to cut the
    > > clutter (at least by 5%) if such words-of-support went privately to their
    > > deserving recipients, rather than being broadcast into the e-mail boxes of
    > > several thousand less-than-fascinated list subscribers.
    > > I've saved *my 5%, now. Anybody got any gigantic schemes for saving
    > > us from the other 95%?
    > >

    --
    Best Regards,

    Pat Gantt pagantt@worldnet.att.net Pat@HomeMail.com
    The University of Tennessee M.S. Human Resource Development
    Electronic Performance Instructor Information Source Locator (ISL)