As 1998 AOM MED Program Chair for the San Diego meeting, I
can suggest to you that a paper related to this might be
a good idea to submit for review.
Collegially,
Charlie Wankel
Martin Donald Kaufman wrote:
> Talk about some wonderful controversy! :)
>
> For those interested, I have been abusing major motion pictures for
> teaching purposes for almost two years now. Ha HA
>
> Do I thumb my nose at the FBI warning? Certainly not. I live in DC so my
> phone and email are probably routinely monitored for evidence of illicit
> video clip dispensation. You can't be too careful nowadays.
>
> How do I do it? Well, I could hold class in my "private family
> home", but that's not very practical. Neither is purchasing videos
> only to be viewed only once or twice. However, there is a way to
> foil overzealous copyright watchdogs. Follow me to the loophole!
>
> OK, OK, all kidding aside. I have been well aware of the fuzziness of
> copyright interpretations as they apply to academia and educational
> purposes in a more general sense. We have the right to photocopy
> previously published material (with certain quantity and recognition
> restrictions) for free, but the world of film media in all its forms is
> quite different, so we have be careful with our assumptions. After
> consultation with an attorney, I was able to devise an alternative
> strategy to fully utilize what I consider a tremendous source for teaching
> material that energizes students...Major Motion Pictures. By assigning
> individual projects, student must ante up $3.50 or so for a rental to be
> viewed at their leisure in their own PRIVATE HOME. I have found films to
> be an especially fruitful resource where group processes, leadership,
> cultural nuances and other relevant topics can be seen "in action" if you
> will. Granted, watching subgroups form in 12 Angry Men doesn't exactly
> mirror what would be seen in the boardroom, but with a videotape, a
> student can observe and reobserve, noting details and subtle shifts that
> would pass unnoticed in a real-world setting.
>
> I apologize for the long-windedness and for any offense my initial remarks
> may have produced, but I do prize motion pictures as a learning aid and
> hope that we can surface some useful guidelines from experts who know far
> more than myself. Perhaps with more information we can reap the benefits
> of this medium while remaining within the legal guidelines for usage.
>
> Thanks for reading on,
>
> Marty Kaufman
> The George Washington University
> Doctoral Student
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 1997, Richard Pernell wrote:
>
> > After responding to the question AND THEN reading some of the other
> > responses, I hereby amend my in initial response with, "I have heard
> > of ......." and "In my classes we talk about the scene where....".
> > etc.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> > Subject: Re: Hollywood Motion Pictures
> > Author: <
MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> at SMTPgate
> > Date: 10/1/97 7:41 AM
> >
> >
> > > Why is it a breach of copyright? Can I not rent the film and show it to my
> > > class?
> > >
> > No, you cannot rent the film from Blockbuster Video or such and show it
> > in any other place than a private family home. There is a notice on the
> > front of videos telling you this. It's the screen that most people fast
> > forward past that begins "FBI warning". You may not rent, copy,
> > distribute, broadcast or show the film to any public gathering other
> > than in a private family home.
> >
> > One of the other lists I subscribe to had a a posting from a member who
> > was fined by one of the major studios $10,000 for showing 10 minutes of
> > film to 20 students in a college level continuing education course.
> >
> > I wish it were a different world where we could share small bits of film
> > for good purpose, but this is considered someone else's property.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > Karen Boringer
> > Communication Resources
> >
commres@rmi.net
> >