Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  MG-ED-DV Digest - 8 Oct 1997 to 9 Oct 1997

    Posted 10-10-1997 09:36
    Marty,

    I am an equal fan of material written for children! One of my favorite
    videos is of "The Neverending Story," which metaphorically illustrates our
    role in creating our collective reality.

    A children's book which is very powerful is "Where the Redfern Grows" by
    Redfield.

    I'd love to receive your complete list after you compile it from all of the
    input. Thanks!

    >From: Martin Donald Kaufman <martyk@GWIS2.CIRC.GWU.EDU>
    >Subject: Dr. Seuss as Leadership Pundit

    >I was wondering if anyone had come across ANY INFORMATION AT ALL regarding
    >the treatment of leadership, management, or even personal effectiveness
    >through children's literature? Again, this is a curiosity and pet project
    >of mine (I'm not staking a career on reading 'The Lorax' to
    >clients, although it might have more impact than many approaches...mine
    >included) so any assistance and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    Don Austin, Ph.D.
    _____________________________________
    Department of Organizational Behavior
    Case Western Reserve University
    Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 932-8421
    _____________________________________

    Researching processes with which small
    groups create valued organization.

    Creating Appreciative Dialogue.


  • 2.  MG-ED-DV Digest - 8 Oct 1997 to 9 Oct 1997

    Posted 10-10-1997 09:36
    >Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:18:21 -0400
    >From: Claire Smith <Clarro@AOL.COM>
    >Subject: Re: Organizational restructuring
    >

    >We can lead a horse to water but we can't make him drink. However, we can
    >make him thirsty.
    >
    >In my experience, change is introduced as something done TO people, rather
    >than WITH people. Change often is imposed rather than inspired and
    >facilitated.
    >
    >When change, of any kind, is presented as though we were doing an organ
    >transplant, let's not be too surprised when the body naturally rejects it.


    Amen!

    Don Austin, Ph.D.
    _____________________________________
    Department of Organizational Behavior
    Case Western Reserve University
    Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 932-8421
    _____________________________________

    Researching processes with which small
    groups create valued organization.

    Creating Appreciative Dialogue.


  • 3.  MG-ED-DV Digest - 8 Oct 1997 to 9 Oct 1997

    Posted 10-10-1997 12:35
    > --------------------------------------------------------
    > Graham Kettles, Defence Evaluation Research Agency UK wrote:
    >
    > "We set up a devolved management structure under which goals, and
    > targets within these goals, were communicated down the organisation
    > and the erstwhile holders of power - the functional departments such
    > as finance, personnel and contracts - were turned instead into
    > service functions who owe their existence only to the quality of the
    > services they provide."
    >

    I would like to second and underscore Graham's experience with
    organizational change (or, at least my understanding of his
    experience). I also have found that the core/glue/sine qua non (or what
    you will) of change in organizations is clarifying corporate goals and
    action programs, and cascading them down throughout the firm. The goals
    for the various workgroups throughout the organization "roll up" to the
    corporate goals.

    What makes it "glue" for me, however, is the very process of developing
    the goals. This involves having each workgroup (who are both internal
    "customer" to a "producer" and "producer" to a "customer") negotiate
    goals across and down corporate lines, with the results of the
    negotiations cycled back to higher levels until some agreement (albeit
    temporary) is reached. Needless to say, this process is never ending.
    It requires continual negotiation, communication -- all the good stuff
    we read about in the books.

    However, unless goals are monitored on a regular basis, slippage occurs
    and responsibility (for errors, inefficiency, etc.) is disowned. I use
    a software product (QMaps) to undertake this function. The program
    represents how each workgroup is doing vis a vis its goals and allows an
    overview of how well these goals are "rolling up" to corporate
    expectations.

    People feel part of the change process. They see themselves as having
    control over the change of which they are part, in contrast to "having
    something done to them". What I have witnessed, then, is a greater (not
    perfect) willingness to introduce, suggest, and accept change in
    processes, roles and organizational structure.