Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  360 Evaluations

    Posted 10-25-1997 11:16
    On Fri, 24 Oct 1997 09:36:36, Jeff Kennedy wrote RE: 360 Evaluations
    >
    >In response to my suggestion to feed ratings back to the raters, Phil
    >Rutherford commented:
    >
    >> If subordinate feedback is to be honest and valid, don't most people
    >> seek anonymity? In which case won't it be difficult to return their
    >> rating?
    >
    >The idea is to return all ratings to each rater, without identifying
    >who gave each rating. Each rater will recognise their own rating, and
    >will be able to compare their assessment with those of the other
    >raters, without knowing who those raters are.
    >

    If Phil's premise is true, the relationship is so bad that ratings would
    carry little information. Other remedial action is indicated.

    Jeff, be aware of the "knife in the back" clique who could publicly scald
    some manager just out of meanness.

    Jack Ring
    Innovation Management
    32712 N. 70th St.
    Scottsdale, AZ 85262-7143
    602-488-4615