<snip> There is a discussion going on in our class about performance
appraisal.
The forced choice method that requires to choose the most descriptive
statement in each pair of statements. <snip>
I have used this approach with performance appraisal. It works
particularly well when the criteria are difficult to measure, like
"attitude" or "credibility." These are not criteria I would pick, but
sometimes you don't pick the criteria by which people are rated. At any
rate, for each criteria, I made a forced-choice grid with the names of all
the employees down the left side and repeated across the top. On that
particular criterion, you choose the strongest individual from each pair.
I'll try an example here, but I'm not sure how it will translate on e-mail.
For a criterion like "presentation skills", make the following grid:
Chris Pat Lynn Sam Cameron Darryl
Chris
Pat
Lynn
Sam
Cameron
Darryl
Then, go down the grid and decide who has the better presentation skills,
Chris or Pat. If it's Chris, put Chris's name in that block. Then compare
Chris to Pat. Put the stronger's name in the block.
When you finish, you can count how often each name appears.
It's not the best way to do a performance appraisal, but it does give you a
ranking of some sort.
Emily Schultheiss
Why settle for surviving...when you could be thriving?