Discussion: View Thread

Summary: Second Annual Worldwide Lessons in Leadership Series

  • 1.  Summary: Second Annual Worldwide Lessons in Leadership Series

    Posted 11-01-1997 09:07
    Forwarded with permission From: Mark_A._Storey@aep.com

    If you would like to praise Mark for his summary of this series, be sure
    to drop him a line at the address above. Note: he is out of the office
    for several days.

    ______________________
    Great Optimism,

    Dutch Driver
    Abilene, TX
    Hm. Telephone: 915.698.7217
    mailto:ddriver@cs1.mcm.edu

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:24:58 -0500
    From: Mark_A._Storey@aep.com
    To: ODNET@tmn.tmn.com
    Subject: ODNet: Second Annual Worldwide Lessons in Leadership Series

    The following is fairly long post recounting the highlights of the seminar
    listed in the subject of this message. Please scroll past, if this subject
    does not interest you.

    BTW, I will not be able to check e-mail 11/2-11/8, so if you respond,
    please be patient.

    Regards,

    -Mark

    Second Annual Worldwide Lessons in Leadership Series

    On Thursday and Friday, 23 and 24 October, I used two days of vacation and
    attended the seminar identified in the subject of this memo. The seminar
    was locally sponsored by Franklin University, and was a closed-caption
    broadcast across the United States as well as to 30 countries around the
    world. The seminar was an excellent chance to hear from many of the
    personal and professional development leaders. The purpose of this memo
    is to share some of the key points made by the speakers. I hope you enjoy
    this brief capsule of two full days of information. Please feel free to
    contact me personally if you would like to discuss some of the points
    mentioned in this memo, or if you want more information about the seminar
    or any of the participants.

    Participants:
    Ken Blanchard, Stephen Covey, Peter Drucker, Gary Hamel, Rosabeth Moss
    Kanter, Kenichi Ohmae, Tom Peters, and Peter Senge. Program moderator was
    Geoffrey Colvin, editorial director of Fortune magazine.

    FORTUNE 500 FORUM's CEO panel, comprised of Lewis E. Platt of
    Hewlett-Packard, John M. Trani of Stanley Works, Inc., and Albert M.. Zeien
    of The Gillette Company, plus John Kotter, Professor of Leadership, Harvard
    Business School.

    The broadcast emanated from historic Faneuil Hall in Boston, MA.

    Highlights from the Participants:

    Blanchard:
    Three secrets that will send people's energy soaring.
    1. People work hard when they believe their work is worthwhile.
    2. Within the boundaries of mission, values and goals, no one person
    should be in charge, i.e. individuals should have some control over
    the work they do.
    3. Don't wait for the final outcome to praise progress.

    Covey:
    We need to begin thinking in terms of "Abundance Mentality". This yields:
    1. more for everyone
    2. security from within
    3. winning private victories
    4. focus on trust building principles
    5. bringing the marketplace to everyone in the organization
    6. co-missions, or overlapping managers and employee missions.
    7. alignment of societal values and laws with our principles.

    "Personal leadership isthe ongoing process of keeping your vision and
    values before you and aligning your life to be congruent with those most
    important things."---Stephen Covey

    Drucker:
    Except for the military and the Catholic Church, developing leaders is
    almost totally neglected.

    Rewards should be based on how many employees are promoted to management
    positions.

    People with expertise should never be overridden by a manager, and should
    not be berated for making the wrong decision. Admonition should only be
    used when no decision is made.

    Hamel:
    Current leadership challenges:
    1. Speed of change
    2. Success is more tenuous than ever before
    3. It's difficult to create a strategy without a map
    4. The new contract says that managers must work their tails off
    creating opportunity for their employees

    Victims, (of bad leadership), must become activists.
    1. change does not start at the top
    2. train people to be activists, to have a passion for ideas

    Activism should be institutionalized
    Top-Down and Bottom-Up are not the only alternatives

    "Strategy has to be subversive. If it's not challenging internal company
    rules or industry rules, it is not strategy."---Gary Hamel

    Kanter:
    Skills of effective leaders are:
    1. the ability to see the big picture, and feel the urgency about the
    need for change.
    2. kaleidoscope thinking, i.e., thinking that embraces change and new
    ideas.
    3. building and articulating a compelling vision.
    4. building allies, backers and supporters.
    5. the ability to create a team feeling and ownership of ideas.
    6. the ability to follow ideas through to completion.
    7. sharing credit and recognition.

    "We have to switch incentives from careers, level and promotion to personal
    reputation, teamwork and challenging assignments." Rosabeth Moss Kanter

    Ohmae:
    Communicating shared mission, rewards, and problems is key to successful
    teams.

    Japanese use blood type to determine the chemistry of teams. The following
    table depicts the relationship of blood type to personality style used by
    Japanese managers.

    Blood Type Style

    A Logical
    B Emotional
    O Accommodating
    AB Wild, inventive

    Japanese team builders make sure that people with each blood type are team
    members. The leader preferably has blood type O, and ideally there is at
    least one person of type AB.

    Today, Japan has too much reliance on groups, (teams).
    Teams are good during the growth phase, but they are overworked now.
    "Thinking globally is the bottom-line price of admission to today's
    borderless economy."Kenichi Ohmae

    Peters:
    To survive, companies need:
    1. phenomenal agility
    2. a shocking lack of arrogance

    Corporate mergers are like two dinosaurs mating to produce a herd of
    gazelles.
    There are companies that like to play with things, companies that like to
    screw around with things, and then there's the other 99%.
    "Trust is the oft-ignored glue that holds the newfangled virtual
    organization together."Tom Peters

    Senge:
    The single most important leadership issue is the nature of control.

    Leadership is a phenomenon by which we determine our future.

    Leadership is greater than vision.
    1. it demonstrates what is
    2. it helps move reality toward the vision, which is the creative
    process, i.e. getting people to do something they aren't used to
    doing.

    Improve the quality of thinking in an organization so people can see
    reality differently.

    Vision and commitment to the truth are two cornerstones to leadership.
    "Where there is a genuine vision, people excel and learn, not because they
    are told to , but because they want to."Peter Senge

    Fortune 500 Forum:
    This part of the entire presentation was very informative and interesting.
    Not only were the panel members' comments very interesting, but also the
    questions from some of the 150 other CEOs in the audience were
    hard-hitting. Because of the nature of the format, I just listed the
    comments of each of the participants, on a couple of topics.

    How do you keep politics out (of an organization)? [This entire discussion
    was very interesting. One audience member, (paraphrasing), pointed out
    that political game players are usually very good at covering themselves,
    and insisted that the panel members' responses vague and not "real world."]

    Platt: "Show you don't tolerate politics."
    Trani: "It's a listening and trust exercise."
    Kotter: "How you deal with a high producer who is political sends VAST
    signals to others."
    Zeien: "Create culture work on People, Product, and Purpose."

    Assessing Leadership Ability [The panel members agreed that the best method
    is to identify associates with some basic leadership skills, then give them
    projects that required leadership, but which, if not successful, would not
    ruin the company. Support through no admonition, and unconditional
    approval of their decisions also were key points mentioned.]

    Platt: "Assess on the job performance."
    Zeien: "Find thost who exceed expectations; colleagues and supervisors.
    Post mortems, (reports, feedback), cause people to alter how they approach
    projects.
    Kotter: "Assessment centers were tried and failed. Use on the job
    (performance), but make sure it's a challenge."
    Trani: "There must be a review of the human resource base, (especially
    after there is a recommendation for a particular person). The number one
    thing a leader does is pick people, (for specific projects and/or
    positions).

    Drucker:
    Why are these initiatives not being done?
    1. So many at the top are afraid of any strength in their associates.
    a. jealousy, fear
    b. real leaders glory in the strength of their associates.
    2. Fear of people who are different.

    Rank is a responsibility, not a privilege.

    Don't abuse the use of teams in order to shirk responsibility.



    Mark A. Storey
    MAStorey@compuserve.com
    Mark_A._Storey@aep.com