As an ex-hard science guy, I realize that no measurement is perfect, but
this does not mean we should not try to improvement our measure of any
phenomenon. Therefore, I would like to suggest an alternative model for
the studying of groups based on Task Cycle Theory. An outline of that
model is as follows:
PHASES AND DIMENSIONS
TASK CYCLE SKILLS FOR TEAMS
I. Focus
A. Clarity of goals and priorities
II. Team Planning
B. Co-Workers competence
C. Consensus planning
III. Facilitation
D. Team atmosphere
E. Newcomer support
F. Conflict resolution
G. Management support
IV. Feedback on Performance
H. Management feedback
I. Monitoring the team's work
V. Team Working Climate
J. Tension/Stress level (***)
K. Domination (***)
L. Satisficing (***)
VI. Member Satisfaction
M. Recognition/Satisfaction
RESULTS AND OUTCOMES
Residual Impact
N. Effectiveness/Outcomes
(***) These inhibitor dimensions may be too high unless they are
accompanied by strong skills in the early phases of the Team Task
Cycles.
I have used Task Cycle Theory (TCT) to study and consult on
management and leadership, and found it quite powerful. You may want
to apply TCT to teams.
Jane Wilson has kindly agreed to send you material on this model and the
instrument derived from it. If you are interested contact her directly at
jwilson@cwginc.com or 800 537-7249.