Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Task Cycle Theory/Groups

    Posted 01-09-1998 09:56
    I would expect your task cycle model below to be very useful in
    characterizing the phenomenon of team interaction and effectiveness, as a
    manifestation of the organizational context in which that particular team
    is embedded. This seems very valuable to me. I don't see this in any way
    as a characterization of what that group of people is or is capable of, in
    any general sense, however.

    I will contact Jane for more information. Thanks!

    >
    >Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:09:05 -0500
    >From: Frank Shipper <FMSHIPPER@SSU.EDU>
    >Subject: Re: Measurability of Teams -Reply
    >
    >As an ex-hard science guy, I realize that no measurement is perfect, but
    >this does not mean we should not try to improvement our measure of any
    >phenomenon. Therefore, I would like to suggest an alternative model for
    >the studying of groups based on Task Cycle Theory. An outline of that
    >model is as follows:
    >
    >PHASES AND DIMENSIONS
    >
    >TASK CYCLE SKILLS FOR TEAMS
    >
    >I. Focus
    > A. Clarity of goals and priorities
    >
    >II. Team Planning
    > B. Co-Workers competence
    > C. Consensus planning
    >
    >III. Facilitation
    > D. Team atmosphere
    > E. Newcomer support
    > F. Conflict resolution
    > G. Management support
    >
    >IV. Feedback on Performance
    > H. Management feedback
    > I. Monitoring the team's work
    >
    >V. Team Working Climate
    > J. Tension/Stress level (***)
    > K. Domination (***)
    > L. Satisficing (***)
    >
    >VI. Member Satisfaction
    > M. Recognition/Satisfaction
    >
    >RESULTS AND OUTCOMES
    >Residual Impact
    > N. Effectiveness/Outcomes
    >
    >(***) These inhibitor dimensions may be too high unless they are
    >accompanied by strong skills in the early phases of the Team Task
    >Cycles.
    >
    >I have used Task Cycle Theory (TCT) to study and consult on
    >management and leadership, and found it quite powerful. You may want
    >to apply TCT to teams.
    >
    >Jane Wilson has kindly agreed to send you material on this model and the
    >instrument derived from it. If you are interested contact her directly at
    >jwilson@cwginc.com or 800 537-7249.

    Don Austin, Ph.D.
    _____________________________________
    Department of Organizational Behavior
    Case Western Reserve University
    Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 932-8421
    _____________________________________
    Creating Appreciative Dialogue.

    Researching how small groups
    create valued organization.


  • 2.  Task Cycle Theory/Groups

    Posted 01-09-1998 12:42
    Donald P. Austin wrote:
    >
    > I would expect your task cycle model below to be very useful in
    > characterizing the phenomenon of team interaction and effectiveness, as a
    > manifestation of the organizational context in which that particular team
    > is embedded. This seems very valuable to me. I don't see this in any way
    > as a characterization of what that group of people is or is capable of, in
    > any general sense, however.
    >
    > I will contact Jane for more information. Thanks!
    >
    > >
    > >Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:09:05 -0500
    > >From: Frank Shipper <FMSHIPPER@SSU.EDU>
    > >Subject: Re: Measurability of Teams -Reply
    > >
    > >As an ex-hard science guy, I realize that no measurement is perfect, but
    > >this does not mean we should not try to improvement our measure of any
    > >phenomenon. Therefore, I would like to suggest an alternative model for
    > >the studying of groups based on Task Cycle Theory. An outline of that
    > >model is as follows:
    > >
    > >PHASES AND DIMENSIONS
    > >
    > >TASK CYCLE SKILLS FOR TEAMS
    > >
    > >I. Focus
    > > A. Clarity of goals and priorities
    > >
    > >II. Team Planning
    > > B. Co-Workers competence
    > > C. Consensus planning
    > >
    > >III. Facilitation
    > > D. Team atmosphere
    > > E. Newcomer support
    > > F. Conflict resolution
    > > G. Management support
    > >
    > >IV. Feedback on Performance
    > > H. Management feedback
    > > I. Monitoring the team's work
    > >
    > >V. Team Working Climate
    > > J. Tension/Stress level (***)
    > > K. Domination (***)
    > > L. Satisficing (***)
    > >
    > >VI. Member Satisfaction
    > > M. Recognition/Satisfaction
    > >
    > >RESULTS AND OUTCOMES
    > >Residual Impact
    > > N. Effectiveness/Outcomes
    > >
    > >(***) These inhibitor dimensions may be too high unless they are
    > >accompanied by strong skills in the early phases of the Team Task
    > >Cycles.
    > >
    > >I have used Task Cycle Theory (TCT) to study and consult on
    > >management and leadership, and found it quite powerful. You may want
    > >to apply TCT to teams.
    > >
    > >Jane Wilson has kindly agreed to send you material on this model and the
    > >instrument derived from it. If you are interested contact her directly at
    > >jwilson@cwginc.com or 800 537-7249.
    >
    > Don Austin, Ph.D.
    > _____________________________________
    > Department of Organizational Behavior
    > Case Western Reserve University
    > Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 932-8421
    > _____________________________________
    > Creating Appreciative Dialogue.
    >
    > Researching how small groups
    > create valued organization.