Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Courage

    Posted 01-13-1998 02:54
    Barbara,

    I think your recent post regarding Empowering you own company was
    very interesting. Your honesty about being scared and impatient
    was very honest.

    Your response about how to take people from the victim frame of
    mind into the proactive frame of mind is also very interesting to
    me. I'm going out on a limb here, but I think that most people in
    their personal lives and company's in general who 'fail' have the
    victim attitude.

    Being overwhelmed by the 'current' situation and feeling
    powerless, means to me that you are a griper or complainer and
    that you expend little energy to move from a low value place to
    one of greater value.

    This is the importance of a Vision to a person or a company.
    Without a vision of the future - of a better place, we expend our
    energy in the current. Energy focussed in one place does not
    move. With regard to Dutch's statement about the human mind, I
    think that when energy is expended in one place without movement
    it must be destructive energy. I would define destructive energy
    as 'fingerpointing', whining, complaining, blaming, regreting,
    etc.

    Since I believe that it is negative energy that moves us torward a
    positive goal, the advantage that we have when trying to change or
    improve a corporate culture that is already expending negative
    energy on the current situation is to redirect that energy from
    current torward a higher ideal - vision.

    Last night I had a brainstorm. If it might be true that negative
    energy drives change, where does positive energy go?

    In our Kaizen philosophy workers are focussed always on one of two
    improvement processes - SDCA (Standardizing) or PDCA (Improving).
    I think positive energy is used to standardize. Happiness with
    the current situation must drive us to repeat that process that we
    are happy with leading us to standardize. Unhappiness (negative
    energy) must drive us to improve.

    Gawd, I hope I am not getting too wrapped up in myself now, to
    sour the list and this thread, but I am going on to say: If
    positive and negative energy are both necessary to balance (call
    it Ying, Yang, if you want) then to keep people productive and in
    the constant improvement mode and away from destructive blaming,
    we probably need to constantly balance improving with
    standardizing. Improving is like rock climbing (which I have
    never done, so I am supposing here) and standardizing is like a
    ledge to rest on. If you continue to climb the energy is
    depleted, if you continue to rest you never regain progress.

    There I said it.

    Thanks for listening.
    Rick Corcoran
    corcoranre@excelinc.com


  • 2.  Courage

    Posted 01-13-1998 09:06
    Richard,
    Let me try another spin on negative energy and positive energy:

    I will agree that negative energy provokes discontent. I believe that
    people without any positive energy merely remain discontent. (They are the
    whiners, complainers, and chronic gripers you mentioned.) Those who thrive
    take the negative energy and turn it to positive energy in order to move
    forward--make changes, do something differently, etc.--whether the result
    is standardization or improvement.

    In my mind (and perhaps only there!) "negative" and "positive" when
    modifying "energy," refer more to the reaction to the situation than the
    intrinsic nature of the situation. Negative energy, then, is what you
    expend stewing over a problem, worrying about it, or complaining. Positive
    energy is what you expend solving the problem--even if that solution means
    removing yourself from the situation.

    Does this make sense?

    Emily Schultheiss
    Why settle for surviving...when you could be thriving?