I do find DiSC has terminologies which are easily appreciated by
managers and field practitioners. It seems to generate more
reflections and discussions on their own behavior rather than having
chuckles with styles using acronyms. Of course, as others have pointed
out, the facilitator's skill and knowledge of the instrument is
critical. If DiSC can let more people aware of its research base and
validity, greater level of comfort in using it can be generated.
We have used DiSC in Hong Kong (HK) for the Commanders at the
Independent Commission Against Corruption. I understand it is also
used in the Bramshill Police College. I also have it used in Canada.
I have used MBTI in HK and Canada. Actually, Dr. McCommic has
attempted to translate it into Chinese and test the validity of it
with the staff I had in HK. I am not sure whether a Chinese version
has been produced by now. MBTI seems to be gaining much acceptance.
Just my two cents of experience of both.
Aaron PUN EdD DPhil
Senior OD and Training Consultant
City of Toronto
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: [MG-ED-DV] FW: [MG-ED-DV] MBTI Exercises
Author: Management Education and Development Discussion
<
MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> at MTMETM04
Date: 3/9/98 9:29 PM
I've heard a lot about MBTI on this list recently, but I find the MBTI to be
very cumbersome. Is anyone using the Carlson Learning Company's DiSC
Dimensions of Behavior Personal Profile System?
DiSC is used in training much like MBTI is, but it is much easier to take and
score. It focuses on behaviors (observable) as opposed to personality (not
observable). The basis for the profile is Dr. William Marston's theories, and
the profile is highly researched. It has some of the highest validity and
reliability scores for any profile on the market, and has been taken by over 30
million people all across the world in the past 20 years.
The MBTI is great for psychologists, but I would think that the DiSC instrument
would be better for management training. Nobody has mentioned it in this line
of discussion, and I was just wondering how many persons were using it in
teaching as opposed to the MBTI.
Gary Lear
President
Resource Development Systems
Management & Training Consultants
P.O. Box 3185
Lake City, FL 32056
Phone: 904-754-0920
Fax: 904-754-0094
Web:
www.atlantic.net/~lear-rds
e-mail:
lear-rds@atlantic.net
A Carlson Learning Company Independent Performax(r) Consultant
Quality Training Increases Quality In Your Organization!
-----Original Message-----
From: OrgCoach
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 1998 11:08 PM
To:
MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
Subject: Re: [MG-ED-DV] MBTI Exercises
Ted: Sorry to confuse you!! This whole thread, which I initiated, has been a
gathering of exercises to facilitate understanding of the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator (MBTI) when facilitating it with teams. Our discussion here has been
rather wrought with lingo, as we were exploring a subset of the facilitated
experience, something called like-type exercises.
MBTI is an indicator of preferences which deal with an individual's
decision-making and data gathering modes, in particular. There are eight
preferences on four scales, they are typically referred to by their single
letter abbreviations, Extraversion (E), Introversion (I), Sensing (S),
iNtuition (N), Thinking (T), Feeling (F), Judging (J) and Perceiving (P).
The exercises we have been exploring are used in the second half an an
experiential session. After you have explained the MBTI, administered and
scored the instrument, and individuals have confirmed their type, they then
meet with others of the same preference to further explore the behaviors
typically associated with this preference.
It is, by the way, a wonderful instrument for indivdual understanding, team
dynamics, and basic diversity exploration.
Andrea
Andrea Sigetich Affiliates
Organization Coaching for magnificent management and team development
Personal Coaching for amazing individual results
OrgCoach@aol.com
uucp