Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  [MG-ED-DV] [MG-ED-DV] MBTI Exercises

    Posted 03-09-1998 17:26
    On 9 Mar 98 at 21:56, Garfield E. Lear, Jr wrote:

    My
    > undergraduate degree was in psychology, and graduate work in
    > Industrial/Organizational Psychology, so I do understand the implications of
    > each. However, some of the reasons that you state you prefer the MBTI over the
    > DiSC is precisely why I like the DiSC.

    Then you probably know that the DISC lacks the strong validation
    studies needed (personally, I don't use tools like this for reasons I
    have outlined in some articles in our newsletter).


    Robert Bacal, Inst.For Cooperative Communication, rbacal@escape.ca
    Visit our Resource Centre for articles on mgmt.,training,communication, and defusing hostility
    at http://www.escape.ca/~rbacal (204) 888-9290


  • 2.  [MG-ED-DV] [MG-ED-DV] MBTI Exercises

    Posted 03-09-1998 21:56
    Susie,
    I would hope that most marketing is not done for the DiSC by trying to tear
    down the MBTI. It definitely has its uses, and Carlson actually indicates that
    the two instruments measure different things, and should NOT be compared. My
    undergraduate degree was in psychology, and graduate work in
    Industrial/Organizational Psychology, so I do understand the implications of
    each. However, some of the reasons that you state you prefer the MBTI over the
    DiSC is precisely why I like the DiSC.
    While having the DiSC presented by a Trained professional is the preferred
    method, it can be self-administered and scored. However, just like the MBTI,
    what do they do with it then? This is where training for either of the
    instruments comes in. It just appears that the DiSC is easier to present,
    score, and use in training for corporate customers, and is easier to train
    others on how to administer and train it.
    Unfortunately, there can be charlatans with each instrument. I have also
    encountered people that have presented the MBTI that had no formal training on
    it, so you are correct in that either can be mis-used or poorly administered or
    mis-applied. It gets scary when either are used as a screening tool.

    Gary Lear
    President

    Resource Development Systems
    Management & Training Consultants

    P.O. Box 3185
    Lake City, FL 32056

    Phone: 904-754-0920
    Fax: 904-754-0094

    Web: www.atlantic.net/~lear-rds
    e-mail: lear-rds@atlantic.net

    A Carlson Learning Company Independent Performax(r) Consultant

    Quality Training Increases Quality In Your Organization!


    -----Original Message-----
    From: H. Susie Coddington, Ph.D.
    Sent: Monday, March 09, 1998 8:42 PM
    To: MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
    Subject: Re: [MG-ED-DV] FW: [MG-ED-DV] MBTI Exercises

    Gary,
    I am familiar with the DiSC and for many reasons still prefer the MBTI. One of
    my biggest "turn-offs" with the DiSC is that I perceive much of the marketing
    for it as being done via speaking negatively of the MBTI. Some hype for the
    DiSC has even included what I consider to be a misinformation about the MBTI.
    I have also encountered colleagues who have preferred the DiSC because it does
    not require the same rigor for training and certification to use as the MBTI.
    IMHO, both instruments can be valuable and both can be equally mis-used. A
    quality instrument does not compensate for a poor administrator/trainer or a
    mis-application.
    Susie

    --
    H. Susie Coddington, Ph.D., Coddington Learning Co.
    410.992.9563 hsusie@erols.com
    LEARNING NEVER ENDS . . .