Discussion: View Thread

TOC - JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT (Chinese Managers)

  • 1.  TOC - JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT (Chinese Managers)

    Posted 02-13-2002 12:37
    One of the more exciting journals is the Journal of Management
    Development, which is a strategic partner of the Academy of
    Management's Management Education and Development Division. This
    article is an example of that. I invite Romie Littrell to further
    discuss this research here in Mg-Ed-Dv.
    Cybercollaborating,
    Charles Wankel
    Mg-Ed-Dv List Director
    wankelc@stjohns.edu
    -------------------------------------


    Volume 21 Issue 1 of The Journal of Management Development, is now
    available via Emerald Fulltext.

    * Subscribers - click here for access
    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0262-1711.htm

    * Non Subscribers - click here for a free trial
    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/rpsv/cgi-bin/emft.pl

    **********************************************


    Title: Desirable leadership behaviours of multi-cultural managers in
    China
    Author: Romie F. Littrell, Associate Professor of International
    Business, Faculty of Business, Auckland University of Technology,
    Auckland, New Zealand
    This monograph reports and compares "desirable" leadership traits, and
    leadership traits actual exhibited by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese and
    expatriate managers and supervisors as defined by responses on the
    original English and a Chinese language translation of the Ohio State
    University leadership behaviour description questionnaire XII, (LBDQ
    XII). Of the 12 factors on the scale, significant differences were found
    only for "Tolerance of Freedom", with the interesting result that the
    Chinese leaders tended to be more tolerant of freedom than the
    expatriate managers, and the supervisors they managed seemed to desire
    even more freedom.
    ...
    The review of the literature and the results of this study indicate that
    additional leadership factors beyond the LBDQ factors are important. Of
    particular interest would be the addition of a factor estimating
    Fukyama's concept of "Trust", as having a significant "Hawthorne
    effect", decreasing the numbers participating in the study, and probably
    having an influence on the leadership ratings by suspicious subjects.
    From this study:
    Subordinates with expatriate supervisors indicate that the "ideal
    leader" should demonstrate "Tolerance for freedom" less frequently than
    do subordinates with Chinese managers. The implication is that after
    experiencing "empowerment", Chinese subordinates may desire a return to
    close, highly directive supervision requiring them to demonstrate little
    initiative, a comfortable, non-demanding environment consistent with
    their experience in the socialist/communist work culture.
    In comparisons of two widely-divergent samples from Hong Kong and China,
    assuming that the PRC is more steeped in Confucian culture than Hong
    Kong, PRC subordinates may tend to rate all managers and leaders highly
    to demonstrate their respect.
    It does not appear that the LBDQ XII, in its present form, is a
    sufficient instrument for comparing leadership skills across cultures,
    but has value in comparing ratings of leadership behaviours across
    cultures on the set of factors measured.
    Several implications, both for practitioners and researchers of
    international management, may be drawn from the findings of this study
    and Selmer's 1996 study. First, it appears that the LBDQ XII is not a
    normative device for estimating leadership skills across cultures, but
    has some use in actually comparing the 12 factors between cultures.
    However, we have the difficult problem of what factors, or traits,
    should be included, and whether or not the LBDQ XII defines the 12 most
    important factors; perhaps not. Guidelines for expatriate manager
    training and counselling may be developed using the LBDQ "ideal" scores
    for an organisation to which he or she will be assigned. Second, it
    seems obvious that "ideal" leader behaviour varies from culture to
    culture, at least when comparing Greater China cultures and "Western"
    cultures, and perhaps even PRC and Hong Kong cultures. We are not
    surprised at this outcome, as practically every study comparing cultures
    since Hofstede's in 1980 have indicated this conclusion.



    Pages: 5-74
    Keywords: Leadership; China; Hong Kong; Hospitality Industry; Hotels
    Article Type: Theoretical with Application in Practice
    Content Indicators: Research - *** Practice - ** Originality - **
    Readability - **


    *********************************************

    For further information, please go to the relevant homepage within our
    portfolio - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals/index.htm