Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  selling term papers

    Posted 10-27-1997 10:52
    Fodder for discussion.
    ______________________
    Great Optimism,

    Dutch Driver
    Abilene, TX
    Hm. Telephone: 915.698.7217
    mailto:ddriver@cs1.mcm.edu

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Fri 10/24/97 12:02 PM
    From: Bill Eadie (weadie@natcom.org)

    Selling term papers a free speech issue?

    Reprinted from "Academe Today," the online service of the Chronicle
    of Higher Education:

    Term-Paper Lawsuit Raises Questions About Free-Speech Rights on Line

    By JULIANNE BASINGER and KELLY McCOLLUM

    Early this week, Boston University sued eight on-line term-paper
    providers in federal court, accusing them of selling the papers over
    the Internet for students to turn in for credit. But the companies
    say the lawsuit violates their First Amendment rights to free speech
    on line.

    And experts say that suing term-paper services misses the larger
    point: If professors paid closer attention to students' work, they
    say, plagiarism would be harder to get away with.
    The university's suit charges the companies with wire fraud, mail
    fraud, and racketeering, as well as with violating a Massachusetts
    law that prohibits the sale of term papers. This summer, the
    university hired a paralegal and a law clerk to investigate the
    companies, said Kevin Carleton, a university spokesman. The law clerk
    posed as a student shopping for term papers.

    The owner of one of the companies named in the lawsuit, Michael von
    Plato, denied any wrongdoing and said he was "both scared and
    angered" by it. Mr. von Plato, president of A-1 Termpapers, of West
    Chester, Pa., said the university's investigation had amounted to
    "outright entrapment" because of the way investigators had posed
    their questions to the sellers. He added that the lawsuit threatened
    his right to freedom of speech.
    Those who wish to censor the Internet "have been unsuccessful in
    going after atomic bombs and pornography," he said. "Now they're
    coming after purveyors of term papers. This is another kind of
    fascism."

    Term-paper companies typically charge from $5 to $35 per page for
    papers in their inventories, but they post disclaimers on their Wo
    rld-Wide Web sites cautioning against plagiarism and warning students
    that the papers are to be used only as research tools. For higher
    fees, some of the companies will prepare papers on topics
    specifically requested by students.

    During the university's investigation, Mr. Carleton said, some of the
    sellers offered to put the student's name, professor's name, and
    course number on the paper's cover sheet, just as they would appear
    on an original paper handed in for credit. In at least one instance,
    a seller asked a student what typeface he wanted. Mr. Carleton called
    the sites' on-line disclaimers "a sham."

    Barton Lowe, the owner of Research Assistance, a company in Los
    Angeles named in the lawsuit, also denied that his company had done
    anything wrong. "I shouldn't be compelled to know what someone is
    going to do with information I provide," he said.
    Anthony Krier, a reference librarian at Franklin Pierce College who
    keeps tabs on the on-line term-paper business, said he doubted that
    Boston University would prevail in court. But he said that students
    and professors must share some blame for the existence of term-paper
    mills.

    Mr. Krier maintains a list of term-paper sites that he distributes to
    professors, deans, and librarians who request it. A professor who
    suspects that a student acquired a paper through the Internet can use
    the list to see if the paper came from an on-line source. When he
    began compiling the list, early this year, it contained fewer than 30
    term-paper sites. He now lists more than 70, some of which offer
    papers at no charge.
    Requests for the list can be sent to kriert@rindge.fpc.edu Mr. Krier
    also offers tips on using Internet search tools to investigate cases
    of suspected plagiarism.

    But catching students in the act isn't the solution to the problem of
    term-paper mills, Mr. Krier said. The reason many students get away
    with using purchased term papers, he said, is that professors who
    teach large classes do not know the writing styles of their students.
    Often, he added, those professors give the same boilerplate
    assignments every semester. "They read so many of them, they don't
    know if they're reading the same ones year after year," he said.

    He recommended that professors require students to turn in
    bibliographies and rough drafts along with their finished papers, or
    that professors ask students to defend their papers in person.

    Larry Spence, a professor of political science at Pennsylvania State
    University, is also director of the Schreyer Institute, which
    explores ways to improve learning at universities. He agreed that
    large classes and unchanging syllabi contribute to the problem. "If
    you can use a paper from one of these mills," he said, "then the
    course hasn't been very well designed."

    Dr. Spence said term-paper services were merely a symptom of a more
    serious problem in college-level teaching. The problem "should be
    giving people fits," he said, "but it's not going to go away with a
    lawsuit."


  • 2.  Selling Term Papers

    Posted 10-28-1997 13:21
    Dutch Driver posted the following message as fodder for discussion:

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Fri 10/24/97 12:02 PM
    From: Bill Eadie (weadie@natcom.org)

    Selling term papers a free speech issue?

    Reprinted from "Academe Today," the online service of the Chronicle
    of Higher Education:

    Term-Paper Lawsuit Raises Questions About Free-Speech Rights on Line

    By JULIANNE BASINGER and KELLY McCOLLUM

    <Lengthy message snipped.>


    Here is my $0.02 worth of fodder:

    Has anyone thought of Honor Codes? My experience is that they work if they are
    allowed AND expected to work. In my undergraduate days, I had to sign an honor
    pledge before the first class freshman year, had to wirte out and sign an honor
    statement on each exam, and sign each paper I turned in to indicate that it was
    my work. 30+ years later I still remember, "I pledge my honor as a gentleman
    that, during this examination, I have neither given nor received assistance."

    Students ran the honor system, which was basically a "One strike and you are
    out" system. And teachers were REQUIRED to leave class room during exams. This
    system worked. It was so much a part of the culture that it was second nature.
    There were very few violations.

    Perhaps in today's terminology I would say that we had a system that built in
    honesty, rather than one that inspected out dishonesty.


    Don Kliest kleist@gdls.com


  • 3.  Selling Term Papers

    Posted 10-29-1997 03:11
    We ought not to be too judgmental. After all, firms incorporate freely and
    then sell merchandise under their own label. It´s called outsourcing.
    Should these teachings be factored into the debate. But then again, what
    are the lessons learned from ¨hollowing out.¨


    At 13:21 28/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
    >Dutch Driver posted the following message as fodder for discussion:
    >
    >---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >Date: Fri 10/24/97 12:02 PM
    >From: Bill Eadie (weadie@natcom.org)
    >
    >Selling term papers a free speech issue?
    >
    >Reprinted from "Academe Today," the online service of the Chronicle
    >of Higher Education:
    >
    >Term-Paper Lawsuit Raises Questions About Free-Speech Rights on Line
    >
    >By JULIANNE BASINGER and KELLY McCOLLUM
    >
    ><Lengthy message snipped.>
    >
    >
    >Here is my $0.02 worth of fodder:
    >
    >Has anyone thought of Honor Codes? My experience is that they work if they are
    >allowed AND expected to work. In my undergraduate days, I had to sign an honor
    >pledge before the first class freshman year, had to wirte out and sign an honor
    >statement on each exam, and sign each paper I turned in to indicate that it was
    >my work. 30+ years later I still remember, "I pledge my honor as a gentleman
    >that, during this examination, I have neither given nor received assistance."
    >
    >Students ran the honor system, which was basically a "One strike and you are
    >out" system. And teachers were REQUIRED to leave class room during exams.
    This
    >system worked. It was so much a part of the culture that it was second nature.
    >There were very few violations.
    >
    >Perhaps in today's terminology I would say that we had a system that built in
    >honesty, rather than one that inspected out dishonesty.
    >
    >
    >Don Kliest kleist@gdls.com
    >


  • 4.  selling term papers

    Posted 10-31-1997 04:20
    I am affected by this in a slightly different way. While running
    a web search for my name (vanity oh vanity) I found that I am
    extensively quoted and referenced in a paper used on two term-paper
    sites as their examplar paper.

    I wrote to complain on the grounds that I did not wish to be
    associated with such a "service":


    - I was horified to find my name on your web site - contained
    - as a "source" reference in your sample article.
    -
    - Firstly, I do not believe your FAQ sheet in its protestations
    - that your site should not be used for cheating - more
    - importantly, I do not think that any other academics would
    - believe it either and so I do not wish to be associated with your
    - site or service.
    -
    - Secondly, you quote me as a source for the "Forming Storming Norming"
    - view of group development - this is absurd and would be seriously
    - "marked down" in any University to which your paper was submitted.
    - My own article does not contain references because
    - it is a chatty rather than an academic piece of writing. However,
    - your "customers" would be expected to do much better than this
    - for credit - and the primary source would need to be found.
    -
    - Thus, for both our reputations - please REMOVE the sample article,
    - and any other ones which use my name.


    and in return got several emails. The first ones were obviously
    slightly editted "form" letters - I guess they get lots of complaints.
    The additions were along the lines of: NO,

    -- After reading such a harsh-- unprovoked,
    -- threatnening and unfairly-accusing discourse from you at 3:30
    -- in the morning here-- I must admit, it's a MATTER OF PRINCIPLE !
    --
    -- P.S. -- (1) We are COMPRISED OF ACADEMICS .. AND-- professors represent
    -- 20% of our clientele as well.
    -- (2) Did you study logic ? If we wanted people to CHEAT, we would make a site
    -- like CHEATER.COM or "Evil House Of Cheat" -- openly promote cheating, make
    -- millions of u.s. dollars and be done -- For someone of your stature, you
    -- don't seem as well-researched as one might expect !

    I was most amused that my comment about quoting primary sources was
    clearly misunderstood - it was suggested that since I was not the
    primary source of "Storming Forming Norming" then I should not
    mind being quoted for it on the web - or in a term-paper (!?)

    The articles still remain on the web - and I suspect will remain
    forever "as a matter of principle".

    I HAVE A SUGGESTION - in the UK the use of computer facilities by
    students is not a fundamental "right". My department provides facilities,
    of course, but their use is limited (by written contract) to work
    associated with courses, learning, etc. Thus we feel able to limit
    the access that students have to certain sites. At the moment we
    do this on a case-by-case basis with the threat that abuse of the
    computer system will result in the removal of access - and the
    policy has only been so far invoked with respect to pornography. But the
    principle exists - and of course the software exists - to allow
    academic institutions to block web-sites. Perhaps there is a case
    for an institution blocking sites which enable violation of that
    institution's regulations.

    Gerard M Blair, Senior Lecturer, The Department of Electrical Engineering,
    The University of Edinburgh, EH9 3JL, Scotland, UK
    Email: gerard@ee.ed.ac.uk - Home page: http://www.ee.ed.ac.uk/~gerard/