Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  importance of factors effecting change

    Posted 04-16-1999 09:44
    Dear Fellow Netters

    I have a questions that I would like some input from those who are actively
    involved in managing change efforts.

    I have been in a discussion with someone, X, over the relative influence of
    various factors on managing change. For example, the importance of the
    change agent's style, or the exact nature of the change (e.g., merging two
    organizations, introducing a new technology, etc), the capabilities of the
    organization, the importance or scope of the change, the state of the
    organization's health (e.g., lots of slack resources, period of growth,
    high versus low profitability), etc. I hope you get the idea.

    What I would like if feedback from those who have been involved with
    multiple change efforts, both successes and failures, (the factors
    associated with these may be different) to give me their two cents.

    So that I don't clog up the airways, you may email me directly at:
    odkbb@ttacs.ttu.edu. I recognize this is as unscientific pool, but I only
    want to get a feel of what those who manage change for a living think.

    If any of my colleagues know of any "academic" study of this issue, I would
    appreciate the reference.

    Tot homines, quot sententiae

    Kim Boal
    --------------------------------
    Kim Boal
    College of Business Administration
    Texas Tech University
    Lubbock, TX 79409
    (806) 742-2150
    KimBoal@ttu.edu


  • 2.  importance of factors effecting change

    Posted 04-20-1999 09:47
    When it comes to change, any type of change, I believe the most important
    factor in it's success is communication. The organizations existing
    philosophy of communication will deeply influence how the change proceeds.

    Examples....

    If communication is very poor or nonexistent, GOOD LUCK. It will be very
    difficult to change that philosophy quickly enough to make a difference.

    If the organization likes to whitewash their communication so that everything
    has a positive, "fairy tail" spin to it, employees will quickly disbelieve
    anything they hear and rely instead on the grapevine (which is often the most
    reliable source of accurate communication in today's organizations.)

    Companies that are used to communicating honestly and often with their staff
    AND that encourage two-way communication have the best chance of succeeding
    with major change efforts.

    Of course, there are many other variable, as well, but in my experience, this
    has been the most important.

    Nancy