Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  360 Feedback Analysis

    Posted 01-04-2001 16:59
    Folks,

    I am conducting a 360 degree feedback / Multirater process with a group.
    As I collect the data, I am wondering what ways the readers of this list
    might suggest as the best ways to analyze the information.

    many thanks for your consideration

    alice

    *****************************************************************
    * Alice Macpherson, TQ,ID,MA phone: (604) 599-2426 vm 9954 *
    * Kwantlen University College email: alicemac@kwantlen.bc.ca *
    * 12666-72nd Ave, Surrey, BC, Canada, V3W 2M8 *
    * "Life Long Learning includes Everyone, All the Time" *
    *****************************************************************


  • 2.  360 Feedback Analysis

    Posted 01-05-2001 14:33
    From: Frank Shipper [mailto:FMSHIPPER@ssu.edu]

    Alice,

    What is the purpose of your analysis?

    Feedback to individual managers? If that is the purpose, I would suggest
    that you look at some of the more comprehensive participant feedback
    reports. The one that I like because it is both flexible and comprehensive
    is the one developed for the Clark Wilson Surveys by the Booth Company in
    Boulder, CO.

    Group feedback? Some of the providers of 360 instruments have rather
    comprehensive group reports. Again, the Booth Company's reports are both
    flexible and comprehensive.

    Validation feedback for management? This usually requires a custom analysis
    where the 360 data is merged with performance data from a second source to
    avoid common source error variance. For some of the better-known instruments
    such as Clark Wilson's Survey of Management Practices, you can find
    validation articles such as:
    Shipper, F., (1995), "A Study of the Psychometric Properties of the
    Managerial Skill Scales of the Survey of Management Practices," Journal of
    Educational and Psychological Measurement, Volume 55, Number 3, pp. 486-497.
    Also, many of the providers of 360 instruments can provide validation
    studies for their instruments.

    For developing research manuscripts? Here the type of research that might be
    conducted is wide open because of the richness of 360 data. See the articles
    on 360 feedback in the February issue of The Academy of Management Executive
    for some ideas. One issue that I think that needs to be addressed is what
    conditions both personally and organizationally enhance the effectiveness of
    360 feedback?

    You can find abstracts of the validation and research articles that I have
    done on 360 feedback at the
    http://faculty.ssu.edu/~fmshippe/home/biblist.htm

    I hope that this gives you some ideas.



    Frank Shipper, Ph.D.
    Professor of Management
    Perdue School of Business
    Salisbury State University
    Salisbury, MD 21801
    Phone: (410) 543-6333
    FAX: (410) 546-6208
    E-mail: fmshipper@ssu.edu
    Home Page: http://perdue.ssu.edu/~fmshippe/home/welcome.htm


    >>> Charles Wankel <cxx@bellatlantic.net> 01/04/01 04:59PM >>>
    Folks,

    I am conducting a 360 degree feedback / Multirater process with a group.
    As I collect the data, I am wondering what ways the readers of this list
    might suggest as the best ways to analyze the information.

    many thanks for your consideration

    alice

    *****************************************************************
    * Alice Macpherson, TQ,ID,MA phone: (604) 599-2426 vm 9954 *
    * Kwantlen University College email: alicemac@kwantlen.bc.ca *
    * 12666-72nd Ave, Surrey, BC, Canada, V3W 2M8 *
    * "Life Long Learning includes Everyone, All the Time" *
    *****************************************************************