Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-18-1999 17:11
    Sat, 17 Apr 1999 Fred Nickols wrote RE: Factors Affecting Change Management
    [...]I learned that it means "So many men, so many minds." That leads
    >me to ask Kim this question: Has anyone ever suggested that the line is
    >sexist?

    The sexist version is "So many men, so little time."

    ++++++++++++Notices:+++++++++++++++++
    1) Pls discontinue sending mail to jxr@mba.com
    2) Telephone area code has changed.

    Jack Ring, 32712 N. 70th St., Snottsdale, AZ 85262-7143
    480-488-4615, Fax)480-488-4616, Cell) 602.369.4615
    Work like you don't need the money.
    Love like you've never been hurt.
    Dance like nobody's watching.


  • 2.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-19-1999 04:16
    Jack wrote,

    >Sat, 17 Apr 1999 Fred Nickols wrote RE: Factors Affecting Change Management
    >[...]I learned that it means "So many men, so many minds."

    I think what Fred translates as "minds" shoukld be "opinions"

    >That leads
    >>me to ask Kim this question: Has anyone ever suggested that the line is
    >>sexist?

    I guess the original was using "men" in the (certainly sexist to us,
    today)) "inclusive" sense where "man", in Latin "homo", means "human
    being" or "person", but its primary meaning is males.
    >
    >The sexist version is "So many men, so little time."

    >Jack Ring, 32712 N. 70th St., Snottsdale, AZ 85262-7143
    >480-488-4615, Fax)480-488-4616, Cell) 602.369.4615
    >Work like you don't need the money.
    >Love like you've never been hurt.
    >Dance like nobody's watching.


    The origin of this is Susanna Shaw, *Women in the John" which is a
    collection of graffiti from what Americans call women's "bathrooms"
    (Carolyn Beam Associates, SF, distrib by Two Continents Pub Group, NY,
    1978.) It is great fun and you will find lots of things in it that are
    now almost clich???s but were very fresh at the time (eg "Only New York
    is real: all the reast is done with mirrors", "A woman w/o a man is
    like a fish w/o a bicycle").

    Jack, I love your tag line.

    Alastair


    "Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you."
    Leroy "Satchel" Paige

    Dr Alastair S. Gunn
    Department of Philosophy
    University of Waikato
    Private Bag
    Hamilton, New Zealand
    Ph 64 7 8562889 X8441
    Fax 64 7 8384047
    Email alastair@waikato.ac.nz

    Qualia Consultants, Applied Ethics
    PO Box 13085
    Hamilton, New Zealand
    Ph/Fax 64 7 8563073
    Email qualia99@hotmail.com





    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


  • 3.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-19-1999 07:11
    Alastair wrote:
    I guess the original was using "men" in the (certainly sexist to us,
    today) "inclusive" sense where "man", in Latin "homo", means "human
    being" or "person", but its primary meaning is males.

    The original quote (from Terence's play Phormio) only involved decisions by
    male characters so the grammar should have only referred to men.

    Best regards,
    Charlie Wankel
    listmaster mg-ed-dv
    wankelc@stjohns.edu


  • 4.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-19-1999 10:38
    Dear Alastair, your translation is the one I had in mind, when I ended my
    email inquiry with it.
    Given, that folks who don't know me, usually think I am a woman, or ask who
    is kimberly when I sign my full name (kimberly), I guess there is plently
    of old fashion sexism to go around.

    Regards, Kim

    At 01:15 AM 4/19/99 -0700, you wrote:
    >Jack wrote,
    >
    >>Sat, 17 Apr 1999 Fred Nickols wrote RE: Factors Affecting Change Management
    >>[...]I learned that it means "So many men, so many minds."
    >
    >I think what Fred translates as "minds" shoukld be "opinions"
    >
    >>That leads
    >>>me to ask Kim this question: Has anyone ever suggested that the line is
    >>>sexist?
    >
    >I guess the original was using "men" in the (certainly sexist to us,
    >today)) "inclusive" sense where "man", in Latin "homo", means "human
    >being" or "person", but its primary meaning is males.
    >>
    >>The sexist version is "So many men, so little time."
    >
    >>Jack Ring, 32712 N. 70th St., Snottsdale, AZ 85262-7143
    >>480-488-4615, Fax)480-488-4616, Cell) 602.369.4615
    >>Work like you don't need the money.
    >>Love like you've never been hurt.
    >>Dance like nobody's watching.
    >
    >
    >The origin of this is Susanna Shaw, *Women in the John" which is a
    >collection of graffiti from what Americans call women's "bathrooms"
    >(Carolyn Beam Associates, SF, distrib by Two Continents Pub Group, NY,
    >1978.) It is great fun and you will find lots of things in it that are
    >now almost clichés but were very fresh at the time (eg "Only New York
    >is real: all the reast is done with mirrors", "A woman w/o a man is
    >like a fish w/o a bicycle").
    >
    >Jack, I love your tag line.
    >
    >Alastair
    >
    >
    >"Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you."
    >Leroy "Satchel" Paige
    >
    >Dr Alastair S. Gunn
    >Department of Philosophy
    >University of Waikato
    >Private Bag
    >Hamilton, New Zealand
    >Ph 64 7 8562889 X8441
    >Fax 64 7 8384047
    >Email alastair@waikato.ac.nz
    >
    >Qualia Consultants, Applied Ethics
    >PO Box 13085
    >Hamilton, New Zealand
    >Ph/Fax 64 7 8563073
    >Email qualia99@hotmail.com
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >______________________________________________________
    >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
    >
    --------------------------------
    Kim Boal
    College of Business Administration
    Texas Tech University
    Lubbock, TX 79409
    (806) 742-2150
    KimBoal@ttu.edu


  • 5.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-23-1999 10:01
    Jeanne Hill ask if the line, "tot homines...." is sexist. If one genders
    "homines" then clearly the answer is yes. If one thinks of it as refering
    to "mankind" (I realize that too is sexist Jeanne), i.e., "all people" then
    perhaps not. In any case, I "read in to" the many comments about the
    sexist nature of the quote, a larger concern all issues relating to gender.
    One of my colleagues, Linda Krefting, who is very well versused in the
    literature on sociobiology informs me that the brain has not changed
    essentially in over 100,000 years. Further that many things relating to
    gender differences, that bother us today, were "hardwired" into the brain
    back then. Thus, even those who are greatly concerned about issues that
    evolve from treating men and women differently (if not inappropriately
    differently), often have a hard time recognizing these differences and
    responding to them. There appears to be conflicts between biology and our
    "emerging" values. Coming to grips with these differences "genders" alot
    of heated debate. It is beyond my level of competence to resolve these
    issues. All I can do, rightly or wrongly, is to treat everyone one as
    individuals. If, on occasion, that requires me to take into account their
    gender, then I guess I will.

    Regards from a "boy named Sue," ie Kimberly

    At 02:17 PM 4/23/99 +0000, you wrote:
    >In response to Jack Ring's message "Sat, 17 Apr 1999 Fred Nickols wrote
    RE: Factors Affecting Change Management
    >[...]I learned that it means "So many men, so many minds." That leads
    >>me to ask Kim this question: Has anyone ever suggested that the line is
    >>sexist?
    >
    >The sexist version is "So many men, so little time." "
    >
    >Why not have a sense of humour/sense of perspective ( as per an
    >Animal Crackers cartoon I've kept over the years) - shows a bird
    >sitting on a telephone wire:
    >'So many cars, so little time...'
    >
    >
    >Jeanne Hill
    >Senior Lecturer
    >Department of International Business
    >University of Central Lancashire
    >Preston, UK
    >PR1 2HE
    >Tel: +44 (0)1772 894686
    >FAX: +44 (0)1772 892906
    >
    --------------------------------
    Kim Boal
    College of Business Administration
    Texas Tech University
    Lubbock, TX 79409
    (806) 742-2150
    KimBoal@ttu.edu


  • 6.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-23-1999 10:06
    > Why not have a sense of humour/sense of perspective ( as per an
    > Animal Crackers cartoon I've kept over the years) - shows a bird
    > sitting on a telephone wire:
    > 'So many cars, so little time...'
    >
    The version I saw was two seagulls flying over a beach were sand couldn't be
    seen,as there were wall-to-wall people sunbathing.
    One seagull turns to another and says "takes all the skill out of it,
    doesn't it"?

    Kevin Fields
    Lecturer: Tourism & Hospitality Management
    Birmingham College of Food, Tourism
    & Creative Studies


  • 7.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-23-1999 10:17
    In response to Jack Ring's message "Sat, 17 Apr 1999 Fred Nickols wrote RE: Factors Affecting Change Management
    [...]I learned that it means "So many men, so many minds." That leads
    >me to ask Kim this question: Has anyone ever suggested that the line is
    >sexist?

    The sexist version is "So many men, so little time." "

    Why not have a sense of humour/sense of perspective ( as per an
    Animal Crackers cartoon I've kept over the years) - shows a bird
    sitting on a telephone wire:
    'So many cars, so little time...'


    Jeanne Hill
    Senior Lecturer
    Department of International Business
    University of Central Lancashire
    Preston, UK
    PR1 2HE
    Tel: +44 (0)1772 894686
    FAX: +44 (0)1772 892906


  • 8.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-23-1999 10:21
    > > Why not have a sense of humour/sense of perspective ( as per an
    > > Animal Crackers cartoon I've kept over the years) - shows a bird
    > > sitting on a telephone wire:
    > > 'So many cars, so little time...'
    > >
    > The version I saw was two seagulls flying over a beach were
    > sand couldn't be
    > seen,as there were wall-to-wall people sunbathing.
    > One seagull turns to another and says "takes all the skill out of it,
    > doesn't it"?
    >
    > Kevin Fields
    > Lecturer: Tourism & Hospitality Management
    > Birmingham College of Food, Tourism
    > & Creative Studies

    What do you guys do up there in Birmingham? Didn't I just see another post
    from a Senior Lecturer in Birmingham? Sounds like you're having way too much
    fun to be "professional" (grin).

    Oh hang on a second, Tom Lodge was from Birmingham, right? Now it all makes
    sense.

    I hear the NorteAmericanos going -- they have fun in Alabama??? No Martha,
    there's a Birmingham in England and it doesn't sound quite like that
    neither.

    I'm sorry, I was just getting tired of all this correctness, and
    correctiveness. Maybe it's the exam season -- or maybe it's hormones.

    There are studies on humor -- see works by Jane Webster on how having fun
    seems to improve retention and learning -- but if we need studies to tell us
    that humor or fun is good, we're just not getting it.

    Mine is a single vote but here it is placed -- I vote we move on.

    Narayan Pant
    Department of Business Policy
    National University of Singapore


  • 9.  Tot homines quot sententiae

    Posted 04-23-1999 15:14
    > There are studies on humor -- see works by Jane Webster on how having fun
    > seems to improve retention and learning -- but if we need studies to tell us
    > that humor or fun is good, we're just not getting it.

    Actually, there is a cognitive movement that suggests that it is bizarre
    imagery that aids in memory encoding and retrieval with regards to memory.

    cheers,


    Eric S. Berghoff
    Univ. of Baltimore, student, M.S.
    Div. of Applied Psychology and Quantitative Methods

    ======================================================
    "Oh brave new world that has such people in it."
    -Aldous Huxley
    ======================================================