Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  New - discussion tread on management

    Posted 11-03-1999 05:46
    Should we seek consensus even tough at the local level this implies sacrifices?
    Or should we just dictate rules from the system perspective?

    I would be interested in discussing how to create the synergy that attracts
    individuals into participating and collaborating even tough in joining they
    stand to lose some of their current freedoms. Using a system maximization view
    of a particular situation we may desired a particular outcome but the
    implications at the local level may lead to strong opposition and thus because
    of local maximization interests the overall desires hardly ever materialize.

    How do we reconcile the local and global interests?



    Does anyone wish to discuss anything other than elevators (lifts to me),
    how to use the e-mail and whether or not systems are required to have a
    purpose. Is anyone else interested in mangement education and
    development?


  • 2.  New - discussion tread on management

    Posted 11-03-1999 12:12
    Esteban asked about methodologies for creating synergies between the global
    and local levels of organizations. I'd like to share a process that I use in
    my consulting practice with my strategic planning clients:
    The process has the nickname " The Walkabout ". It gets its name from
    the fact that all the participants in the dialogue get to visibly see the
    strategic activity of all the other global players in a session where they
    literally " walk around " a room in which planning matrices are posted on the
    walls. They are invited to add comments, indicate conflicts, and identify
    opportunites for synergy in that process. I primarily use this exercise as a
    tool for asssuring organizational alignment around key strategic issues.
    Time is also spent on gaining alignment and buy-in around the organization's
    mission and vision. This sets the groundwork for the " tough" discussions
    that will naturally follow in any significant change effort.
    If anyone is interested in more detail regarding this process, I refer
    you to the Summer 1998 National Productivity Review article " Harnessing the
    Power of Visual Strategic Deployment".

    Regards,

    Joe Colletti
    Hoshin1@aol.com


    In a message dated 11/3/99 11:48:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
    esteban@CEMEX.COM writes:

    << I would be interested in discussing how to create the synergy that attracts
    individuals into participating and collaborating even tough in joining they
    stand to lose some of their current freedoms. Using a system maximization
    view
    of a particular situation we may desired a particular outcome but the
    implications at the local level may lead to strong opposition and thus
    because
    of local maximization interests the overall desires hardly ever materialize.
    >>


  • 3.  New - discussion tread on management

    Posted 11-03-1999 23:17
    ESTEBAN TREVI�O MUGUERZA wrote:

    > Should we seek consensus even tough at the local level this implies
    > sacrifices?
    > Or should we just dictate rules from the system perspective?
    >
    > I would be interested in discussing how to create the synergy that
    > attracts
    > individuals into participating and collaborating even tough in joining
    > they
    > stand to lose some of their current freedoms. Using a system
    > maximization view
    > of a particular situation we may desired a particular outcome but the
    > implications at the local level may lead to strong opposition and thus
    > because
    > of local maximization interests the overall desires hardly ever
    > materialize.
    >
    > How do we reconcile the local and global interests?

    Could I shift the conflict to: short term and long term objectives?
    Similar, I suspect. Hard to see long term objectives, hard to see
    global intersts.

    The (glib?) response is, that managers must present short term
    incentives (goals) to the workers, the achievement of which helps the
    company reach the corporate long term goals.

    Of course, that implies that managers understand and own the long term
    goals, and understand the relationships of the different goals.

    I'm sure some do.

    But the balancing act, between short and long term objectives, between
    local (narrow?) and global interests, still remains.

    Jay
    --
    Jay Warner
    Principal Scientist
    Warner Consulting, Inc.
    4444 North Green Bay Road
    Racine, WI 53404-1216
    USA

    Please Note: New Area Code ------
    Ph: (262) 634-9100
    FAX: (262) 681-1133
    email: quality@a2q.com
    web: http://www.a2q.com

    The A2Q Method (tm). What do you want to improve today?