Discussion: View Thread

leading vs. managing (leading more lofty than managing)?

  • 1.  leading vs. managing (leading more lofty than managing)?

    Posted 11-11-1999 23:33
    (My apologies for entering two messages today about this subject. I also
    apologize for sounding rather grumpy in the following e-mail.)

    Discussions about leading vs. managing seem to occur regularly in HRNET,
    TRDEV, ODNET, MD-ED-DV, etc. It also seems lately that managing is
    portrayed as tedious and uncreative, while leading, on the hand, is
    portrayed as grand, lofty, etc. Simiarly, definitions of leading tend to
    be highly colorful and extensive, while defnitions of managing tend to
    be short and trite. The nature of these portrayals concerns me.

    My doctoral studies included extensive review of a great deal of
    literature about leadership, including leading vs. managing, etc.
    Authors typically suggest various new visions and character traits that
    leaders should have in order to face the new millennium. Too often,
    these authors seem to ignore altogether any advice about managing, ie.,
    how these lofty new visions and traits can actually be implemented in
    the day-to-day realities of managing an organization. (An excellent book
    that clearly explains this issue is "Beyond the Hype" by Eccles and
    Nohria.)

    I wonder if these authors ignore the activity of managing because they
    take it for granted that implementing new visions and traits just isn't
    all that difficult? -- or does the activity of managing (as it's too
    often perceived) seem just too boring to have to even address?

    An organizational leader with no skills in managing can be utterly
    disastrous to an organization (for example, see Founder's Syndrome at
    http://www.mapnp.org/library/misc/founders.htm)

    This issue is compounded when, too often, authors of literature about
    leadership portray confusing and contradictory notions of the term
    leadership. I wrote an article to try help readers understand and get
    the most out of literature about leadership. I hope it helps this
    discussion.

    The article is at http://www.mapnp.org/library/ldrship/ldng_lit.htm and
    includes sections:
    - Potential for Confusion Among Readers of Leadership Literature
    - "Leading": A Basic Definition as a Starting Point
    - Where the Confusion Often Starts: Traits Versus Roles
    - Writers Have Varying Views on "Leading" and "Managing"
    - Writers Have Varying Views on Universal Versus Relative Perspectives
    of Leadership
    - Writers Might Interchange Terms "Managing" and "Management" in Same
    Article
    - Writers Might Vary Modes of Time in Same Article
    - Writers Might Mix Reference to Traits and Roles in Same Article
    - Writers Sometimes Vary Scope of the Term "Leader" in Same Article
    - Is Sometimes Difficult to Glean Clear Message About Good Leadership
    - Is Sometimes Difficult to Glean Consistent Message About Good
    Leadership
    - Suggestions to Completely Understand Literature About Leadership

    (There is also a basic overview of leadership at
    http://www.mapnp.org/library/ldrship/ldrship.htm )

    ========================================================================
    - FREE MANAGEMENT LIBRARY at http://www.mapnp.org/library/topics.htm
    - Authenticity Consulting for coaching and management development;
    - - - Call 612-536-9984
    - Provide peer-coaching to clients (see http://www.leaderscircles.org )
    - Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Minneapolis, MN; email: mcnam007@tc.umn.edu
    ========================================================================