Discussion: View Thread

Attachments, flames, netiquette, etc.

  • 1.  Attachments, flames, netiquette, etc.

    Posted 11-25-1999 23:26
    Golly. What a day. Lengthy debate on attachments,
    flames, netiquette, etc.

    Since the debate still seems to be going on, I'll
    note that:

    1) Attachments do create problems. I support
    Charlie Wankel's position on this for the many
    reasons he and others gave.

    2) Setting email program to forbid attachments
    is not an option for some of us. We work on projects
    that require us to send files back and forth among
    many colleagues. Forbidding attachments would make
    our project work difficult.

    3) I dial up from my home office. Large attachments
    take forever. Massive attachments shut the system down.

    4) Distributing attachments to large lists -- even
    on internal systems -- can create problems. Our
    IT staff has a strict policy against attachments to
    our intramural lists, despite our excellent IT
    facilities. The 21st century may bring new
    possibilities, but thus far, we're still in the 20th.

    5) Many reposted prior messages with repeats
    and threepeats of reposted responses. Why not
    summarize and reply to salient issues? At least
    edit and discard headers and sigs. Care using reply
    function is helpful.




    Ken Friedman, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor of Leadership and Strategic Design
    Department of Knowledge Management
    Norwegian School of Management
    Box 4676 Sofienberg, N-0506 Oslo
    Norway

    +47 22.98.51.07 Direct line
    +47 22.98.51.11 Telefax

    email: ken.friedman@bi.no

    Home and home office:

    Ken Friedman
    Byvagen 13
    S-24012 Torna Hallestad
    Sweden

    +46 (46) 53.245 Telephone
    +46 (46) 53.345 Telefax

    email: ken.friedman@bi.no