Well, FWIW, I don't have any quarrel with saying something like "our team won" or "our company is a leader in its field" or any number of other, similar statements. They are verifiable assertions. I would have trouble with statements like "our team believes in itself" or "our company shows compassion toward its employees." These latter statements attribute human characteristics to non-human entities.
As for a contract between you and the school where you work, there can indeed be such a contract, legal and binding, because the school is or is part of a legal entity and can in fact enter into binding contracts, own property, etc. (No, they can't vote - at least not yet.)
--
Regards,
Fred Nickols
Managing Partner
Distance Consulting, LLC
nickols@att.net
www.nickols.us
"Assistance at A Distance"
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Bolman, Lee G." <
BolmanL@UMKC.EDU>
>
> Would it be an incorrect anthropomorphism to assert, for example, that "Our team
> won"? Or would it only become incorrect if the assertion were expanded to
> something like, "Our team really wanted to win"? And, if you're correct that
> individuals can't have contracts with society, does that also mean that there
> can be no contract between you and the school where you work?
>
>
>
> Lee
>
>
>
> From: Management Education and Development Discussion
> [mailto:
MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Romie Littrell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 3:43 PM
> To:
MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
> Subject: Anthropomorphising Groups, Societies, Organisations
>
>
>
> I’m critiquing a research paper by a post-graduate student who has referenced
> a quotation from an article by Gray, Owen & Adams (1996) in which they
> anthropomorphise “society”, explaining society as “a series of social
> contracts between members of society and society itself”. Society is a network
> of various kinds of linkages where people gather to do things. Society is not a
> conscious entity that does things of its own volition. Moreover, the things done
> there are transactions that occur in large numbers, at the volition of many
> people and institutions, motivated by a diverse array of reasons for engaging in
> them. People tell me what groups, societies, organisations did today, why it did
> that, what it is afraid of, what it is struggling to do, or what external
> influences are preventing it from accomplishing its intent. None of these
> statements is true. To re-emphasise, an organisation, group, society, or market
> is a place where people gather to do things, not a conscious entity that does
> things of its own volition that can be analysed as if it were a human being.
>
> Any agreement, disagreement, other ideas?
>
> Gray, R, Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and Accountability; Changes
> and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting, Harlow: UK:
> Prentice-Hall Europe.
>
>
>
> Do not accustom yourself to use big words for little matters.
>
> -Samuel Johnson
>
> Romie F. Littrell, BA, MBA,PhD, FIAIR, An fánaí fiáin
> AUT Business School N.Z.,
romie.littrell@aut.ac.nz
>
http://www.romielittrellpubs.homestead.com/
>
http://www.crossculturalcentre.homestead.com/
> Facilitator, Leadership & Management in Sub-Sahara Africa Conferences
> Contents copyright Romie F. Littrell
>
>
>