I said I'd "hush up", but I have to ask one more question of us.
"Formula answers". Are these not models of some aspect of organizational
effectiveness? What if these formulae work, haven been proven to do
so over many applications? Should we academics not be hearing about
these? I don't know about you folks, but it's no easy thing for me,
a business professor, to get out there and spend much "quality time"
in businesses these days. At least those consultants with their
formulated answers seem to have to put their models to the acid test.
I am sure we could toss off many criticisms of Six Sigma (in all
its dresses), for example, but in the meantime, 1,000's of GE practitioners, for
example, are out there applying those formulae on GE's nickel.
What a body of empirical data that must be! Maybe one day someone
will write about GE's experience with Six Sigma in one of our journals.
Until then, that's just another one of those fads, I guess.
Good Lord, why did I wake up this morning with a burr under my good nature?
NOW, I'll hush.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Edryce Reynolds [mailto:
edryce@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:29 PM
To:
MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
Subject: Re: [MG-ED-DV] Consultants as Mass Marketeers
Jack has summed it up well. I agree, which is why I could never be a full-time consultant - unless I had an independent income, so I could afford to take "real" consulting jobs (ones in which the customer really wants something other than CYA).
Edryce
Jack Ring <
jring@amug.org> wrote:Most consulting firms, especially the larger ones, sell formula answers.
Whether customers would be served better with custom answers is left to the
customer to decide. Many customers just want CYA evidence, not answers.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now