Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  online discussion on changes in MBA curriculums

    Posted 04-21-2003 06:51
    The Chronicle of Higher Education is sponsoring
    an online discussion this week on changes being
    made in the MBA curriculums of many business
    schools. The Chronicle invites members of this
    list to read an article on the changes and to join
    the discussion at:

    http://forums.chronicle.com/colloquy/read.php?f=1&i=1788&t=1788

    Scott Jaschik
    Editor
    The Chronicle of Higher Education


  • 2.  online discussion on changes in MBA curriculums

    Posted 04-21-2003 09:54
    Mg-Ed-Dv-ers,

    I am engaged by the below invitation from Scott
    scott.jaschik@chronicle.com to join the fray of discussion at the Chronicle
    of Higher Education's site. This discussion centers around an article in
    the current issue "The New M.B.A.: Business-school professors shift programs
    to emphasize relevance and flexibility," by Katherine S. Mangan
    katherine.mangan@chronicle.com (one of my favorite Chronicle journalists):
    http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i33/33a01201.htm

    The article is very stimulating though I found it dismaying that the
    research reported in Jeffrey Pfeffer pfeffer_jeffrey@gsb.stanford.edu and
    Christina T. Fong cfong@stanford.edu , "The End of Business Schools? Less
    Success Than Meets the Eye," Academy of Management Learning and Education,
    1, 1(2002): 78+ is attributed only to Pfeffer. (When I see a doctoral
    student co-author I assume they did a bit of the work.) My favorite moment
    in that article is "Leavitt asserted that 'we have built a weird, almost
    unimaginable design for MBA-level education' that distorts those subjected
    to it into 'critters with lopsided brains, icy hearts, and shrunken souls'
    (1989: 39)." [Leavitt, H. J. hjleavitt@earthlink.net Educating our MBAs: On
    teaching what we haven't taught, California Management Review, 31, 3(1989):
    38-50]. An article that Pfeffer and Fong quote quite a bit is J. S.
    Armstrong armstrong@wharton.upenn.edu , "The devil's advocate responds to an
    MBA student's claim that research harms learning," Journal of Marketing, 59(
    1995): 101-106. They cite Armstrong (p. 104) for "At Wharton, for example,
    less than one percent of the students fail any given course, on average ....
    the probability of failing more than one course is almost zero. In effect,
    business schools have developed elaborate and expensive grading systems to
    ensure that even the least competent and least interested get credit."

    Well, you can see that I am getting carried away by the prospect of
    joining the fray in this discussion at the Chronicle:
    http://forums.chronicle.com/colloquy/read.php?f=1&i=1788&t=1788
    I hope you do too!

    Cybercollegially,
    Charles Wankel
    Mg-Ed-Dv List Director
    The Academy of Management Management Education and Development Discussion
    Forum
    http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?SUBED1=mg-ed-dv&A=1

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Management Education and Development Discussion
    [mailto:MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Jaschik
    Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 6:51 AM
    To: MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
    Subject: online discussion on changes in MBA curriculums

    The Chronicle of Higher Education is sponsoring
    an online discussion this week on changes being
    made in the MBA curriculums of many business
    schools. The Chronicle invites members of this
    list to read an article on the changes and to join
    the discussion at:

    http://forums.chronicle.com/colloquy/read.php?f=1&i=1788&t=1788


    Scott Jaschik
    Editor
    The Chronicle of Higher Education