Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  MG-ED-DV Innovation

    Posted 04-27-2003 00:40
    Innovation fits on a continuum Spontaneity, Creativity, Innovation,
    Invention and Mental Masturbation.
    Innovation is purposeful (aka goal-seeking) creativity with essentially no a
    priori constraints on permissible solutions (aka thinking outside the box).
    Invention is Innovation constrained by convention (making the box bigger).

    An Innovator sees things not for what they are but for what they do or can
    do. Secondly, an innovator does not score highly in "plays well with
    others"

    Innovation management creating an environment and providing that nourishment
    that fosters creativity, creates clear awareness of purpose or goal and
    assures the 'generators' that lots of little errors are valuable.

    You can read a lot of books about innovation as you can about composing
    music or painting pictures but if you decide to do that pick one written by
    an innovator rather than just an observer. Innovation tends to be tacit and
    inexplicable, though experienceable.

    > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:45:15 -0600
    > From: Gary Lundquist <garyl@market-engineering.com>
    > Subject: Definition of Innovation
    >
    > Colleagues,
    >
    > I've accepted chairmanship of The Colorado Innovation Summit - lots of
    work
    > for not much pay.
    >
    > When I started, I thought I knew what "innovation" is. Now I've seen the
    > word used in many different ways.
    >
    > I would appreciate your insights.
    > What is innovation?
    > What characterizes an innovator?
    > What is innovation management?
    >
    > Thank you.
    >
    > Gary


  • 2.  MG-ED-DV Innovation

    Posted 04-28-2003 03:21
    I've been interested in the range of definitions but I'd like to stress the
    "business" side rather than the straight creativity side. To me innovation
    implies more than invention; it relates to the effective transfer of
    invention to the marketplace. Innovators are those who have the
    entrepreneurial capacity to take new ideas, products and services, identify
    their business potential and support them to allow them to grow and succeed.
    I suppose I'm defining it as successful applied research rather than the
    "blue sky" research which may in turn lead to innovation.

    Best wishes

    Lynn Martin

    Lynn.martin@uce.ac.uk
    Dr L M Martin
    Senior Academic, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
    UCE Business School
    Perry Barr
    Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK
    00441213317796/5000


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jack Ring
    To: MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
    Sent: 27/04/03 05:40
    Subject: Re: MG-ED-DV Innovation

    Innovation fits on a continuum Spontaneity, Creativity, Innovation,
    Invention and Mental Masturbation.
    Innovation is purposeful (aka goal-seeking) creativity with essentially
    no a
    priori constraints on permissible solutions (aka thinking outside the
    box).
    Invention is Innovation constrained by convention (making the box
    bigger).

    An Innovator sees things not for what they are but for what they do or
    can
    do. Secondly, an innovator does not score highly in "plays well with
    others"

    Innovation management creating an environment and providing that
    nourishment
    that fosters creativity, creates clear awareness of purpose or goal and
    assures the 'generators' that lots of little errors are valuable.

    You can read a lot of books about innovation as you can about composing
    music or painting pictures but if you decide to do that pick one written
    by
    an innovator rather than just an observer. Innovation tends to be tacit
    and
    inexplicable, though experienceable.

    > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:45:15 -0600
    > From: Gary Lundquist <garyl@market-engineering.com>
    > Subject: Definition of Innovation
    >
    > Colleagues,
    >
    > I've accepted chairmanship of The Colorado Innovation Summit - lots of
    work
    > for not much pay.
    >
    > When I started, I thought I knew what "innovation" is. Now I've seen
    the
    > word used in many different ways.
    >
    > I would appreciate your insights.
    > What is innovation?
    > What characterizes an innovator?
    > What is innovation management?
    >
    > Thank you.
    >
    > Gary


  • 3.  MG-ED-DV Innovation

    Posted 04-28-2003 07:24
    Colleagues,

    Lynn Martin wrote: To me innovation implies more than invention; it relates
    to the effective transfer of invention to the marketplace.

    This is part of why I am seeking a range of viewpoints on innovation and
    innovation management.

    Some see innovation as creativity. I tend to put that under invention.

    Some see it as reduction of an idea to practice. That means work done
    in R&D environments can be considered innovation if efforts results in a
    working prototype (technology, process, etc.)

    Some see it as reduction to a product (service, etc.) in target markets.
    That would mean that academia, federal labs, etc., must transfer their
    technologies to commercial companies to complete innovation. That people
    and teams in academia might be innovative, but not innovators. But then,
    would commercialization teams be the innovators? Must one do it all to be
    an innovator?

    As I speak to people about The Colorado Innovation Summit, I get all three
    views. Thus my three questions:
    What is innovation?
    What characterizes an innovator?
    What is innovation management?

    I'm still searching.



    ----------------------------
    Change will never, ever again
    be as slow as it is today.

    Gary Lundquist - The Accelerator
    303-840-9929 www.market-engineering.com
    garyl@market-engineering.com

    The science of
    making and keeping satisfied customers,
    at a profit, over time,
    in a competitive environment.


  • 4.  MG-ED-DV Innovation

    Posted 04-28-2003 09:02
    Xerox is a famous innovator, developed the mouse, the GUI and many more
    ideas. Unfortunately, their spirit of innovation did not translate into
    sales and profits. It was left to companies such as Apple and Microsoft,
    which are often thought of as innovative, who are not innovators as much as
    they were/are managers of innovation.

    Those companies took a creative concept and managed it's presentation and
    acceptance. They managed the evolution of an innovative idea through the
    application and implementation stages.

    Innovation is a creative concept but the value of innovation lies in
    applying the concept to resolve a problem.

    Can there be innovation w/o application? Certainly. Will that innovation
    be valued by society until there is an application? Probably not.

    I remember being a kid (now 48 yrs old) and seeing one of the first
    telephones that also sent your picture. That was innovation that languished
    until the infrastructure (satellites and cable and internet) grew to support
    that ability. Even video conferencing/webinars languished until 9/11, and
    now SARS, created an environment that valued that method of communication
    more than exposing employees to the now perceived problem of dangerous
    travel conditions. The value of the innovation wasn't realized until the
    environment evolved to create a niche that needed filling.

    Christie Mason

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Gary Lundquist" <garyl@market-engineering.com>
    To: <MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU>
    Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 6:24 AM
    Subject: Re: MG-ED-DV Innovation


    Colleagues,

    Lynn Martin wrote: To me innovation implies more than invention; it relates
    to the effective transfer of invention to the marketplace.

    This is part of why I am seeking a range of viewpoints on innovation and
    innovation management.

    Some see innovation as creativity. I tend to put that under invention.

    Some see it as reduction of an idea to practice. That means work done
    in R&D environments can be considered innovation if efforts results in a
    working prototype (technology, process, etc.)

    Some see it as reduction to a product (service, etc.) in target markets.
    That would mean that academia, federal labs, etc., must transfer their
    technologies to commercial companies to complete innovation. That people
    and teams in academia might be innovative, but not innovators. But then,
    would commercialization teams be the innovators? Must one do it all to be
    an innovator?

    As I speak to people about The Colorado Innovation Summit, I get all three
    views. Thus my three questions:
    What is innovation?
    What characterizes an innovator?
    What is innovation management?

    I'm still searching.



    ----------------------------
    Change will never, ever again
    be as slow as it is today.

    Gary Lundquist - The Accelerator
    303-840-9929 www.market-engineering.com
    garyl@market-engineering.com

    The science of
    making and keeping satisfied customers,
    at a profit, over time,
    in a competitive environment.