Discussion: View Thread

Response to Edryce on "lateral thinking"

  • 1.  Response to Edryce on "lateral thinking"

    Posted 11-13-2003 09:25
    You are right, Edryce

    a faculty member's lot is not an easy one.

    However, as my original posting pointed out, if we develop a curriculum that
    helps students translate the theories into practical decision guidelines, the
    more likely that they will take something useful with them when they step out
    into the work-world.

    There, however, they make decisions that affect stakeholders very soon, if
    not immediately.

    Understanding what they should consider with every such decision, and
    developing habits to be thorough in asking appropriate questions will make them more
    effective - not only in their work environment but also their personal lives.

    Let me answer your question: "What is the goal of your questions?" with what
    might be considered my original statement of objective for starting this
    thread, let me repeat two points:

    7.  There is little in the field of management and leadership education and
    development that directly addresses this need for learners to acquire greater
    competence in decision making.  Victor Vroom's work on participation and
    Herbert Simon's emphasis on decisions rather than actions, are two outstanding
    exceptions.  However, the focus of education in Organizational Behavior (behavioral
    science) aspects of management is primarily on theories and descriptive
    examples of the application of theories to specific situations, rather than on
    helping learners develop the critical thinking and analysis skills that lead to
    consistently better decisions in all situations.

    8.  Better balance between the descriptive and prescriptive (as is done in
    the scientific and functional disciplines) would likely bring graduates of
    educational and developmental programs who will make better comprehensive
    management and leadership decisions and thus probably bring more effective
    organizations.

    These two points can be seen as a call to join in an effort to define what
    management education (and development) can do so graduates will be better able
    to make effective decisions, especially in their leadership roles, when they
    are called on to lead a project, lead in gaining agreement on an idea in a
    meeting, leading a team, or, ultimately possibly leading in their professions or
    leading an entire organization.

    Finally, my Point 5 is also relevant here:

    5.  A group of comprehensive, integrated questions that can remind of all or
    most of the issues that deserve consideration in a decision, can help to
    ensure that relevant issues are not likely to be ignored.

    If we can define such a list of questions and then concentrate on helping
    learners develop the habit to use them reqularly, we will probably make
    management education and development significantly more effective. We might wind up
    writing a book together.

    My post was an attempt to rally support for such a definition and support for
    gaining a foothold in academia, and especially in Organizational Behavior
    courses for this viewpoint.

    Cheers,

    Erwin (Rausch)  didacticra@aol.com and erausch@kean.edu