Fred wrote:
"It seems to me that what you've listed are areas where questions could be
developed but you haven't listed any questions"
You are right, Fred - each of these can be phrased in the form of a question
- and I do as the next step. I think I said so in a follow-up post in
response to the same issue raised by someone. Could not find it, so my apologies for
not remembering that I should anticipate this objection.
Fred also said: "You refer to these eight items as "groups of
considerations," not questions. Is there something I'm not getting?"
No, you had it straight - all you have to do is turn them into questions, as
you correctly observed. I doubt that you need help with that, but one easy
way to create questions would be to add, at the beginning of each statement:
"What do we have to do to...' and then fix the grammar. Should you want
clarification, I will be happy to provide it.
The reason I like to speak of groups of considerations is because that is
clearer than to say 'questions with great meaning, as conveyed in subsidiary
questions'.
Erwin (Rausch)
didacticra@aol.com and
erausch@kean.edu