Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors

    Posted 03-17-2004 11:14
    From: Jacob Eisenberg [mailto:Jacob.Eisenberg@ucd.ie]

    Dear Colleagues,

    Recently, some of our faculty members here were approached regarding various
    items that faculty posted on the outside part of their own office doors.
    They were asked to remove all items from the doors because of some vague
    reasons that generally has to do with looks. Now, to be sure, these postings
    are not some kind of provocative material; typically these are copied
    portions of articles, conference and talk announcements, quotes etc.

    As this was not an issue in the other few academic institutions I resided
    in, I was wondering on the norms and policies in other universities and
    colleges as well as your personal opinions on this matter: should faculty be
    discouraged, or even prohibited to post items on their door? Should it be
    limited to clearly non-offensive materials (defined by whom?)?


    Thanks,

    Jacob Eisenberg, Ph.D.
    Department of Business Administration,
    Quinn School of Business,
    University College Dublin,
    Belfield, Dublin 4,
    Ireland

    Tel: +353-1-716 4774
    Fax: +353-1-716 4762
    Email: Jacob.eisenberg@ucd.ie
    http://www.ucd.ie/busadmin/


  • 2.  Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors

    Posted 03-17-2004 12:05
    From: Naomi Olson [mailto:olsonen@rcn.com]


    In reply to Jacob Eisenberg's post:

    In our department faculty post everything from notes to students to family
    photos to silly cartoons about dogs and wine to pictures of Dolly Parton on
    their doors.

    I would say: "Lighten up! Our reputations will be defined by our integrity,
    energy, productivity, relevance, wisdom and etc., not by the appearance of
    our office doors. We were attracted to this career because we are creative,
    expressive people, who at best are capable and inspiring communicators. And
    we are trying to teach our students to be the same... To encourage our and
    their well-being, allow -- and encourage -- us to express ourselves."

    If called upon to propose content-guidelines, I would probably draw the line
    at hate speech or images and text that reasonable people would agree
    students might find intimidating. I think this kind of thing is generally
    self-enforced; we don't want to risk our personal reputations any more that
    the school wants to risk its own....

    My 2 cents.

    Naomi Olson
    --
    Naomi Olson, Doctoral Candidate
    Organization Studies, Carroll School of Management
    Boston College
    617-558-6866
    olsonen@rcn.com
    --
    "Do human beings ever realize life when they live it? Every, every minute?"
    Emily looking down on "Our Town" by Thornton Wilder


  • 3.  Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors

    Posted 03-17-2004 12:51
    Well, organizational culture is just culture.
    It sounds very strange to me that someone in the beatiful Ireland could
    confuse the office door of a teacher with the shop window of a fashion
    store, but may be that's a matter of tradition and habits, ie,
    organizational culture.
    Then, we know organizational culture is influenced also by the local context
    and every organization have its "personality" and cultural identity, that
    could differ with that of other organizations, operating in the same sector.
    So, may be the attention to "Etiquette" is a common trait in irish
    universities, or its just a specific cultural trait of your college. For
    what i know, there is nothing similar in Italy.
    I find very improbable teachers at university can't wait to post "offensive
    materials" on the door, but if i should indicate some criteria, in order to
    avoid inappropriate posting, i would recommend to avoid the posting of
    documents containing explicit political, racial and sexual implications.
    Relating the question "defined by whom", it depends on the internal
    organization of the university, may be. I think the principle of autonomy of
    teaching should suggest some kind of autarchy (self regulation by the
    community of teachers).

    Best Regards

    Fabrizio Maimone


    Dr Fabrizio Maimone

    LUMSA University of Rome
    Communication Sciences
    Via della Traspontina, 21
    00193 Rome
    Italy

    Office: Via di S. Erasmo, 12
    00184 Rome Italy
    tel/fax: ++39 06 70454469
    mobile phone: 3478003479
    email: fabrizio.maimone@tin.it


  • 4.  Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors

    Posted 03-17-2004 14:56
    Jacob,

    At this institution, on the west coast of Canada, we have only the Canada
    and BC Human Rights Acts as legislation which lay out (13 categories in
    BC) things that might be discriminatory and advises us not to do this
    (under penalty of law).
    Other than that, the University College has no particular polices or rules
    in this matter. I can't think of a situation where something like you
    describe has happened here.

    There are many items on all the doors to faculty offices, none in
    particularly bad taste and none in abeyance of the law.
    Personally, I have a colourful sticker on my door that says "Celebrate
    Diversity - Stop Racism"

    If this were to happen here I would be wondering about who was needing to
    control whom?

    thoughtfully

    Alice Macpherson
    PD & PLA Coordinator
    Kwantlen University College
    604 599-3040

    "The palest ink is stronger than the strongest memory." (Chinese proverb)




    Charles Wankel <cxx@bellatlantic.net>
    Sent by: Management Education and Development Discussion
    <MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU>
    03/17/2004 08:13 AM
    Please respond to cxx


    To: MG-ED-DV@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
    cc:
    Subject: Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors


    From: Jacob Eisenberg [mailto:Jacob.Eisenberg@ucd.ie]

    Dear Colleagues,

    Recently, some of our faculty members here were approached regarding
    various
    items that faculty posted on the outside part of their own office doors.
    They were asked to remove all items from the doors because of some vague
    reasons that generally has to do with looks. Now, to be sure, these
    postings
    are not some kind of provocative material; typically these are copied
    portions of articles, conference and talk announcements, quotes etc.

    As this was not an issue in the other few academic institutions I resided
    in, I was wondering on the norms and policies in other universities and
    colleges as well as your personal opinions on this matter: should faculty
    be
    discouraged, or even prohibited to post items on their door? Should it be
    limited to clearly non-offensive materials (defined by whom?)?


    Thanks,

    Jacob Eisenberg, Ph.D.
    Department of Business Administration,
    Quinn School of Business,
    University College Dublin,
    Belfield, Dublin 4,
    Ireland

    Tel: +353-1-716 4774
    Fax: +353-1-716 4762
    Email: Jacob.eisenberg@ucd.ie
    http://www.ucd.ie/busadmin/


  • 5.  Academic Organizational Culture and Office Doors

    Posted 03-17-2004 17:38
    From: William Sharbrough [mailto:william.sharbrough@citadel.edu]


    Further:

    I work at The Citadel, a rather unique state institution, where we have a
    dress code that includes no facial hair, military uniforms, rank in the
    South
    Carolina militia, etc. We all knew that when we took our jobs. But in 19
    years, no one has ever said anything about the stuff on or around our doors.

    I agree with Naomi, the administration at your college has better things to
    do than police office doors (What's smaller than micromanagement?)!

    William Sharbrough

    On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:04:37 -0500
    Charles Wankel <cxx@bellatlantic.net> wrote:
    > From: Naomi Olson [mailto:olsonen@rcn.com]
    >
    >
    > In reply to Jacob Eisenberg's post:
    >
    > In our department faculty post everything from notes to students to family
    > photos to silly cartoons about dogs and wine to pictures of Dolly Parton
    on
    > their doors.
    >
    > I would say: "Lighten up! Our reputations will be defined by our
    > integrity,
    > energy, productivity, relevance, wisdom and etc., not by the appearance of
    > our office doors. We were attracted to this career because we are
    > creative,
    > expressive people, who at best are capable and inspiring communicators.
    > And
    > we are trying to teach our students to be the same... To encourage our and
    > their well-being, allow -- and encourage -- us to express ourselves."
    >
    > If called upon to propose content-guidelines, I would probably draw the
    > line
    > at hate speech or images and text that reasonable people would agree
    > students might find intimidating. I think this kind of thing is generally
    > self-enforced; we don't want to risk our personal reputations any more
    that
    > the school wants to risk its own....
    >
    > My 2 cents.
    >
    > Naomi Olson
    > --
    > Naomi Olson, Doctoral Candidate
    > Organization Studies, Carroll School of Management
    > Boston College
    > 617-558-6866
    > olsonen@rcn.com
    > --
    > "Do human beings ever realize life when they live it? Every, every
    minute?"
    > Emily looking down on "Our Town" by Thornton Wilder

    William C. Sharbrough, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor and Management & Marketing Division Head
    School of Business Administration
    The Citadel, Charleston, SC
    william.sharbrough@citadel.edu O: 843.953.5164 F:843.953.6764