Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?

    Posted 01-03-2005 13:17
    From: Lee Chadwick Simmons (Dr) ACSLee@ntu.edu.sg

    I have some thoughts on this from the perspective of a former employer who
    went out of business due to the minimum wage increase when it went over $5
    an hour. I used to be in the business of raising money for charities. We
    made telephone calls requesting donations and sent out mass mail asking for
    donations. My market was the small start-up charities who could not afford
    the large firms who do this type of consulting and charge enormous fees. One
    of my early contracts was with MADD when they were getting going. I hired a
    lot of high school students who worked in the evening for around $4 an hour
    to start. In order for them to get a raise they had to generate more income
    than their wages cost me. We were paid on a percentage basis on all income.
    Keeping in mind that there are office, managerial, telephone, printing and
    other expenses they had to generate about 5 times their hourly pay in
    donations to justify their salary. For most of those students this was their
    first job and they did get some valuable experience in the business world.
    They were not counting on their income to support anything except their own
    teenage lifestyle. It takes a week or so to train someone to do this kind of
    work, some are just not suited and then they have to maintain sufficient
    income to cover that week plus their ongoing salary. Some did quite well and
    received much higher wages. Most didn't. This kind of business to help
    charities is usually seen as a positive input to society. Training young
    people is a positive input to society. However, I am out of business due to
    the minimum wage increase. What all this verbiage is getting at is that for
    the most part the minimum wage applies to people who it are not trying to
    use it as their main income and to raise a family. Simply applying it to all
    on the basis of the increased cost of living does not help those who are in
    the position of just entering the workforce.

    Second thought is on taxes. The people who are making minimum wage pay
    almost no income tax. The amount of money lost due to them losing their job
    or even if their job is moved overseas is tiny. Instead we should probably
    train them to do more value added jobs and increase their standard of
    living. As far as I can tell the only ways to increase the standard of
    living in any society is either to increase output on a per capita basis or
    to increase the value added that each person inputs into the goods and
    services produced by that society. If we really wanted to improve the
    standard of living we would close down the low paying jobs and move them
    overseas and retrain those doing them to do higher value added jobs. The
    textile industry is a prime example of this. Just recently I found an
    article on some McDonalds outsourcing the voice and order taking at the
    drive through windows. It turns out to be faster and more accurate.

    Lee C. Simmons
    Auburn University
    SimmoLC@auburn.edu


    ________________________________

    From: Business Ethics Teaching Space on behalf of Charles Wankel
    Sent: Mon 1/3/2005 11:13 PM
    To: BETS-L@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
    Subject: Re: Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?



    From: Jan Bohren [mailto:Ethos21st@aol.com]

    My last thought on this one is that expansion of the Earned Income Tax
    Credit allows the employer who doesn't pay a living wage to pass the
    difference off on the American taxpayers. Should we support that
    business person without making him or her open the books to see the
    profits they are reaping from the business?

    - Jan Bohren

    On Jan 3, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Ian Welton wrote:

    > Norman Hawker on 03 January 2005 at 05:40 wrote:-
    >
    >>
    >> These objections, at least from US employers, could be met by
    >> expanding
    >> the Earned Income Tax Credit for employees who make less than
    >> a living
    >> wage.
    >
    > How would this deal with any ethical aspects of an employers
    > responsibility
    > towards employees?
    >
    >
    > Jan Bohren in the message of 03 January 2005 at 05:31 said:-
    >
    >>
    >> Notwithstanding the objections of employers who feel they could not
    >> stay in business by having to pay a "living wage" to
    >> employees, perhaps
    >> the economics ought to drive out of business those who choose to
    >> exploit people who can't find jobs where the pay meets or exceeds the
    >> poverty level.
    >>
    >> Another way to look at this would be to consider whether an
    >> employer in
    >> China or Southeast Asia that now pays $3 a day for labor should
    >> continue to pay unlivable wages to employees in order to
    >> compete in the
    >> shoe, sock, or clothing market.
    >>
    >> Where exactly does the concept of labor exploitation fit in our
    >> business economy? Maybe the FLSA is not such an archaic law
    >> after all.
    >
    >
    > What affect would raising the costs of any consumer products have on
    > the low
    > income families reliant upon those low cost products for their
    > survival?
    >
    >
    > Fred Nickols on 03 January 2005 at 09:11 observed:-
    >
    >> Norman Hawker's suggestion (see below) reminds me of another
    >> tax issue. The
    >> practice of off-shoring erodes the tax base. People lament
    >> the loss of jobs
    >> but, so far at least, I haven't heard much about the negative
    >> impact of
    >> off-shoring on taxes. Where is that being examined?
    >>
    >
    > Where income redistribution by a tax system is used, which
    > organisations/social groups generally benefit?
    >
    >
    > If any, what degree of importance is given to any privacy involved in
    > these
    > matters to the individuals/organisations concerned?
    >
    >
    > Ian W
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Business Ethics Teaching Space
    >> [mailto:BETS-L@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols
    >> Sent: 03 January 2005 09:11
    >> To: BETS-L@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
    >> Subject: Re: Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?
    >>
    >>
    >> Norman Hawker's suggestion (see below) reminds me of another
    >> tax issue. The
    >> practice of off-shoring erodes the tax base. People lament
    >> the loss of jobs
    >> but, so far at least, I haven't heard much about the negative
    >> impact of
    >> off-shoring on taxes. Where is that being examined?
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >>
    >> Fred Nickols
    >> nickols@att.net
    >>
    >>> -----Original Message-----
    >>> From: Business Ethics Teaching Space
    >> [mailto:BETS-L@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU] On
    >>> Behalf Of Norman Hawker
    >>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 12:40 AM
    >>> To: BETS-L@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
    >>> Subject: Re: Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?
    >>>
    >>> On Jan 3, 2005, at 12:31 AM, Charles Wankel wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Notwithstanding the objections of employers who feel they
    >> could not
    >>>> stay in business by having to pay a "living wage" to employees...
    >>>
    >>> These objections, at least from US employers, could be met
    >> by expanding
    >>> the Earned Income Tax Credit for employees who make less
    >> than a living
    >>> wage.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Norman W. Hawker
    >>> Associate Professor
    >>> Haworth College of Business
    >>> Western Michigan University
    >>> 1903 West Michigan Avenue
    >>> Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008
    >>


  • 2.  Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?

    Posted 01-03-2005 14:43
    On 3 Jan 2005 at 13:17, Charles Wankel wrote:

    > From: Lee Chadwick Simmons (Dr) ACSLee@ntu.edu.sg
    >
    What all this verbiage is getting at is that
    > for the most part the minimum wage applies to people who it are not
    > trying to use it as their main income and to raise a family. Simply
    > applying it to all on the basis of the increased cost of living does
    > not help those who are in the position of just entering the workforce.

    I'd be more comfortable if we had real data to support the contention
    above.

    I also think the issue of paying on the basis of "life situation" is
    an interesting one. Should a person with a family get paid more than
    a person entering the workforce without one, who is doing the exact
    same job at the same level of productivity?

    ...and it might be a good time to remember that the exact same
    arguments have been used to both discriminate against, and pay women
    less, in the 60's and on.

    Robert Bacal - New - The Customerservicezone.com at
    http://customerservicezone.com
    Visit http://workhelp.org for over 2,200 work related articles and
    work tools.
    http://conflict911.com - Conflict Management Resource Center, and
    http://performance-appraisals.org for performance management help,
    and our new
    flagship site, http://workhelp.org


  • 3.  Is it sensible to raise the minimum wage in New York?

    Posted 01-03-2005 22:55
    I can't help it :)

    Robert Bacal wrote:

    >On 3 Jan 2005 at 13:17, Charles Wankel wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>From: Lee Chadwick Simmons (Dr) ACSLee@ntu.edu.sg
    >>
    >>
    >>
    > What all this verbiage is getting at is that
    >
    >
    >>for the most part the minimum wage applies to people who it are not
    >>trying to use it as their main income and to raise a family. Simply
    >>applying it to all on the basis of the increased cost of living does
    >>not help those who are in the position of just entering the workforce.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I'd be more comfortable if we had real data to support the contention
    >above.
    >
    >I also think the issue of paying on the basis of "life situation" is
    >an interesting one. Should a person with a family get paid more than
    >a person entering the workforce without one, who is doing the exact
    >same job at the same level of productivity?
    >
    >...and it might be a good time to remember that the exact same
    >arguments have been used to both discriminate against, and pay women
    >less, in the 60's and on.
    >
    During the 1930's - that big decline and slow semi-recovery in the GDP,
    remember - women were released from some jobs because a male wage earner
    was presumed to have family responsibilities behind him. And the same
    reason was used to reduce women's wages for other jobs as well.

    My grandmother, a school teacher in those years, suffered repeated wage
    reductions along with the suggestion that she remarry. that she had 4
    children in her care at the time didn't seem to enter into the
    considerations.

    And I also would like to see some serious breakdowns in family income
    levels and number of people in families across the entire wage/family
    responsibility spectrum. Especially the lower levels. As I understand,
    the median family wage these days in the US is about $30,000. The
    average wage of professors at Madison (UW-Madison, our flagship school)
    is something in excess of $90,000. I don't begrudge the professors
    their incomes. But it is very hard to listen to pontification about
    minimum wages without some sense of intuitively feeling the grinding
    effects of that minimum wage on those who depend on it. And I count
    myself in the 'pontificating' group.

    While I'm on the soapbox, I should point out that the income
    distribution histogram I downloaded from the Dept. of Labor violates one
    of Tufte's rules about histograms - the class intervals are not
    constant. Either they wanted the chart to come out looking more or less
    'Normal' or sought to simulate a logarithmic income scale without
    actually making the transformation. In either case, the increasingly
    wide income disparity the US is experiencing these days is masked by the
    chart. There is a possibility that failure to recognize the
    implications of this disparity led to incorrect retailers' predictions
    this past Christmas season.

    Cheers and an informative, insightful 2005,

    Jay

    --
    Jay Warner
    Principal Scientist
    Warner Consulting, Inc.
    4444 North Green Bay Road
    Racine, WI 53404-1216
    USA

    Ph: (262) 634-9100
    FAX: (262) 681-1133
    email: quality@a2q.com
    web: http://www.a2q.com

    The A2Q Method (tm) -- What do you want to improve today?