Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-23-2005 20:24
    From time-to-time Mg-Ed-Dv will share doings at other lists germane to our
    topical focus. You are invited to comment on such items on Mg-Ed-Dv.
    Cybercollegially, Charles Wankel

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------

    From: Professional & Organization Development Network in Higher Education
    [mailto:POD@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Terri Buckner
    Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:52 PM
    To: POD@listserv.nd.edu
    Subject: Re: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Deming also applied the Pareto function to training by saying that 80%
    of any problem stems from a faulty process while 20% comes from human
    error; and yet we spend 80% of our resources to fix humans (training).
    Perhaps if we quit trying to force student learning into a linear,
    time-based process, the concept of assessment could move away from the
    competitive grades process and closer to a feedback loop that provides
    students with the data needed to become more self-correcting.

    La Lopa, Joseph M wrote:

    >Louis, if I am not mistaken Dr. Edward Deming found the same to be true
    >(the "fear factor") in the working world when he developed the 14 points
    >that management leaders should implement as part of their responsibility
    >to improve corporate systems. Point 8 is "drive out fear so that
    >everyone may work effectively for the company." Might this point not
    >also apply when we talk about improving academic systems?
    >
    >Here is another very cool point he made about "grades." He felt that
    >there should be no individual grades to determine who "passes" or
    >"fails" as those two constructs are a function of the system that
    >produced them. Deming thought that educators should look at the
    >historical performance parameters of their "educational system" in terms
    >of establishing the mean performance of students with a tolerance of 3
    >standard deviations for a given class, department, college, etc. At the
    >end of the semester grades are given to see how the "system" is
    >performing -- not the students. If students earn grades that are "out
    >of tolerance" then the onus is then on those who established the system
    >in the first place to fix the problem. Now HOW COOL IS THAT!!!!!
    >
    >Mick La Lopa
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Professional & Organization Development Network in Higher
    >Education [mailto:POD@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Louis Schmier
    >Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:02 PM
    >To: POD@listserv.nd.edu
    >Subject: [POD] FW: [POD] a world without grades [was: The various
    >meanings assigned to grades]
    >
    >
    >So, Dru, if the reward is not present the performance and quest for
    >achievement disappears? The latest research, especially that coming out
    >from the Harvard School of Business, shows that the "pressure" of the
    >grade engenders a fear of failing and punishment. Such negatives
    >diminish the quotient of imagination and creativity as well as the risk
    >to succeed.
    >
    >
    > --Louis--
    >
    >
    >Louis Schmier www.therandomthoughts.com
    >Department of History
    >www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
    >Valdosta State University
    >Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /\ /\ /\ /\
    >(229-333-5947)


  • 2.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-26-2005 12:52
    I agree with the statement "Perhaps if we quit trying to force student
    learning into a linear,time-based process, the concept of assessment could
    move away from the
    competitive grades process and closer to a feedback loop that provides
    students with the data needed to become more self-correcting." referring to
    Deming's 80-20 (or 80 - 15 as some people put it) principle. Unfortunately,
    we need to consider also if the admission system of the colleges and
    universities, or even the high school systems from where these students come
    is a type of system that allows professors to start a system that can help
    move "closer to a feedback loop that provides students with the data needed
    to become more self-correcting." Here, I personally see us trying to deal
    with a subsystem without looking at the bigger whole system.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Charles Wankel" <wankelc@optonline.net>
    To: <MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:24 PM
    Subject: DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades


    > From time-to-time Mg-Ed-Dv will share doings at other lists germane to our
    > topical focus. You are invited to comment on such items on Mg-Ed-Dv.
    > Cybercollegially, Charles Wankel
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    > ----------------
    >
    > From: Professional & Organization Development Network in Higher Education
    > [mailto:POD@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Terri Buckner
    > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:52 PM
    > To: POD@listserv.nd.edu
    > Subject: Re: [POD] Systems thinking on grades
    >
    > Deming also applied the Pareto function to training by saying that 80%
    > of any problem stems from a faulty process while 20% comes from human
    > error; and yet we spend 80% of our resources to fix humans (training).
    > Perhaps if we quit trying to force student learning into a linear,
    > time-based process, the concept of assessment could move away from the
    > competitive grades process and closer to a feedback loop that provides
    > students with the data needed to become more self-correcting.
    >
    > La Lopa, Joseph M wrote:
    >
    > >Louis, if I am not mistaken Dr. Edward Deming found the same to be true
    > >(the "fear factor") in the working world when he developed the 14 points
    > >that management leaders should implement as part of their responsibility
    > >to improve corporate systems. Point 8 is "drive out fear so that
    > >everyone may work effectively for the company." Might this point not
    > >also apply when we talk about improving academic systems?
    > >
    > >Here is another very cool point he made about "grades." He felt that
    > >there should be no individual grades to determine who "passes" or
    > >"fails" as those two constructs are a function of the system that
    > >produced them. Deming thought that educators should look at the
    > >historical performance parameters of their "educational system" in terms
    > >of establishing the mean performance of students with a tolerance of 3
    > >standard deviations for a given class, department, college, etc. At the
    > >end of the semester grades are given to see how the "system" is
    > >performing -- not the students. If students earn grades that are "out
    > >of tolerance" then the onus is then on those who established the system
    > >in the first place to fix the problem. Now HOW COOL IS THAT!!!!!
    > >
    > >Mick La Lopa
    > >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >From: Professional & Organization Development Network in Higher
    > >Education [mailto:POD@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Louis Schmier
    > >Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:02 PM
    > >To: POD@listserv.nd.edu
    > >Subject: [POD] FW: [POD] a world without grades [was: The various
    > >meanings assigned to grades]
    > >
    > >
    > >So, Dru, if the reward is not present the performance and quest for
    > >achievement disappears? The latest research, especially that coming out
    > >from the Harvard School of Business, shows that the "pressure" of the
    > >grade engenders a fear of failing and punishment. Such negatives
    > >diminish the quotient of imagination and creativity as well as the risk
    > >to succeed.
    > >
    > >
    > > --Louis--
    > >
    > >
    > >Louis Schmier www.therandomthoughts.com
    > >Department of History
    > >www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
    > >Valdosta State University
    > >Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /\ /\ /\ /\
    > >(229-333-5947)
    >


  • 3.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-26-2005 17:05
    Abainesh (and others interested in a different approach to learning),

    You might find an article that appeared in the Journal of Management Inquiry,
    Vol.4 No. 3, September 1995 titled "Rhythms of Learning: Patterns that Bridge
    Individuals and Organizations" by David Cowan of Miami University of interest in
    this area. It is far too complex to try to summarize here.

    Make a Great Day!

    Gary Lear, President & CEO

    Resource Development Systems LLC
    Managing the Human Side of Business (sm)

    www.ResourceDevelopmentSystems.com

    (c) 2005 permission denied to use this post in any other forum or in any way
    other than on the discussion list that it was originally posted.


  • 4.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-26-2005 18:07
    Gary,

    Dear Gary,

    I just browsed through your site. Your philosophical statement

    "It's not just processes, but people that drive performance."


    misses the whole point. One needs to look at the whole system. taking
    processes, people, etc. piecemeal does not produce as good results as one
    possibly could.


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Gary Lear" <discuss@RDS-NET.COM>
    To: <MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
    Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 5:05 PM
    Subject: Re: DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades


    Abainesh (and others interested in a different approach to learning),

    You might find an article that appeared in the Journal of Management
    Inquiry,
    Vol.4 No. 3, September 1995 titled "Rhythms of Learning: Patterns that
    Bridge
    Individuals and Organizations" by David Cowan of Miami University of
    interest in
    this area. It is far too complex to try to summarize here.

    Make a Great Day!

    Gary Lear, President & CEO

    Resource Development Systems LLC
    Managing the Human Side of Business (sm)

    www.ResourceDevelopmentSystems.com

    (c) 2005 permission denied to use this post in any other forum or in any way
    other than on the discussion list that it was originally posted.


  • 5.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-26-2005 23:56
    Abainesh,

    I believe you really need to look at the entire page on our site to grasp the
    full understanding of our philosophy, and even then, it is only a small part of
    what we talk about. As you say, it is more than just a single part, or in this
    case, a single sentence. American Indian philosophy has long taken this view of
    wholeness and inclusion. The Lakota phrase "Mitakuye Oyasin" literally means
    "all my relations" but in essence captures the idea that all things are related
    in the grand scheme of things.

    The method of most American Indian approaches is to look at the whole, then take
    it down to the individual parts, keeping in mind that they are still connected
    to the whole, and then to move back out to the whole again. If you want to
    learn more about this you can read the following article by Paula Underwood.
    The site jumbles up her article a bit, but it is still readable
    (http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/NAworldview.html).

    But where so many other western approaches are focused on trying to control
    processes and other "non-people" issues, we believe that the key to
    organizational performance resides in the relationships people have with each
    other and other things, including the culture of the organization. As stated in
    our web site, we believe that the research is showing that the primary
    differentiator in organizational performance is people. However, this does not
    mean that you can ignore those other issues that comprise the whole.

    However, I've actually come to even question just how far we should be focusing
    on controlling processes, especially in light of some of the thoughts shared in
    the article by Cowan, some of the research on strengths by Gallup, and some of
    my other readings. I'm beginning to believe that having a strong alignment to
    Purpose is more important than strictly controlling processes. Sure, there
    needs to be some boundaries, but having an understanding of the whole just may
    be more important than controlling small parts of the process. This is
    something that I've just started to question in this manner, however, and my
    thoughts are not fully formed, I must admit.

    Anyway, if you'd like a graphical model of our beliefs, you can find it here:

    http://www.resourcedevelopmentsystems.com/Models/7%20Elements%20of%20High%20Perf
    ormance.pdf

    It is based on some of the more recent information coming out of the large scale
    studies and the teachings of the Medicine Wheel. I think you'll also see some
    connection with the Cowan article. A detailed written explanation of our model
    is in the works, but it's no where near being ready.

    I hope this helps to clarify things, and I do hope you can find that article by
    Cowan. I honestly don't recall where I obtained my copy, and I can't find it on
    the internet, although I've seen some other articles that cite it listed.
    Perhaps your university library will be of some help. I think you really will
    find it interesting and thought provoking.

    Make a Great Day!

    Gary Lear, President & CEO

    Resource Development Systems LLC
    Managing the Human Side of Business (sm)

    www.ResourceDevelopmentSystems.com

    (c) 2005 permission denied to use this post in any other forum or in any way
    other than on the discussion list that it was originally posted.


  • 6.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-27-2005 03:29
    Gary

    The Cowan article you recommend using a Native American medicine
    frame to create a model for learning is largely (except for two diagrams)
    available at:
    http://mgv.mim.edu.my/Articles/00419/960209.Htm
    A summary of the article by Sue Gilly of the Fielding Institute at:
    http://home.flash.net/~jteague/Sue/
    It is in a section entitled "Medicine Wheel".

    Best regards,
    Charles Wankel
    http://management-education.net



    -----Original Message-----
    From: Management Education and Development Discussion
    [mailto:MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Gary Lear
    Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:56 PM
    To: MG-ED-DV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Subject: Re: DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Abainesh,

    I believe you really need to look at the entire page on our site to grasp
    the
    full understanding of our philosophy, and even then, it is only a small part
    of
    what we talk about. As you say, it is more than just a single part, or in
    this
    case, a single sentence. American Indian philosophy has long taken this
    view of
    wholeness and inclusion. The Lakota phrase "Mitakuye Oyasin" literally
    means
    "all my relations" but in essence captures the idea that all things are
    related
    in the grand scheme of things.

    The method of most American Indian approaches is to look at the whole, then
    take
    it down to the individual parts, keeping in mind that they are still
    connected
    to the whole, and then to move back out to the whole again. If you want to
    learn more about this you can read the following article by Paula Underwood.
    The site jumbles up her article a bit, but it is still readable
    (http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/NAworldview.html).

    But where so many other western approaches are focused on trying to control
    processes and other "non-people" issues, we believe that the key to
    organizational performance resides in the relationships people have with
    each
    other and other things, including the culture of the organization. As
    stated in
    our web site, we believe that the research is showing that the primary
    differentiator in organizational performance is people. However, this does
    not
    mean that you can ignore those other issues that comprise the whole.

    However, I've actually come to even question just how far we should be
    focusing
    on controlling processes, especially in light of some of the thoughts shared
    in
    the article by Cowan, some of the research on strengths by Gallup, and some
    of
    my other readings. I'm beginning to believe that having a strong alignment
    to
    Purpose is more important than strictly controlling processes. Sure, there
    needs to be some boundaries, but having an understanding of the whole just
    may
    be more important than controlling small parts of the process. This is
    something that I've just started to question in this manner, however, and my
    thoughts are not fully formed, I must admit.

    Anyway, if you'd like a graphical model of our beliefs, you can find it
    here:

    http://www.resourcedevelopmentsystems.com/Models/7%20Elements%20of%20High%20
    Perf
    ormance.pdf

    It is based on some of the more recent information coming out of the large
    scale
    studies and the teachings of the Medicine Wheel. I think you'll also see
    some
    connection with the Cowan article. A detailed written explanation of our
    model
    is in the works, but it's no where near being ready.

    I hope this helps to clarify things, and I do hope you can find that article
    by
    Cowan. I honestly don't recall where I obtained my copy, and I can't find
    it on
    the internet, although I've seen some other articles that cite it listed.
    Perhaps your university library will be of some help. I think you really
    will
    find it interesting and thought provoking.

    Make a Great Day!

    Gary Lear, President & CEO

    Resource Development Systems LLC
    Managing the Human Side of Business (sm)

    www.ResourceDevelopmentSystems.com

    (c) 2005 permission denied to use this post in any other forum or in any way
    other than on the discussion list that it was originally posted.


  • 7.  DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER LISTS: [POD] Systems thinking on grades

    Posted 09-27-2005 09:40
    Charles,

    Thanks so much for this link to the article. I had searched in vain for it on
    the net previously. I had found several articles by Sue Gilley where she
    referenced the article, but nothing further, and I have wanted to share this
    article with several others. As I stated, I don't even know how I got the
    article, as it appeared on my desk a few weeks ago as I was rummaging for some
    other item. I vaguely recall someone sending it to me (I don't even know who
    now), but I believe that it was several years ago and I tucked it away for later
    reading; now I feel like I've found a buried treasure. The link you've provided
    now means I get to share it with many others. Thank you very much!

    Make a Great Day!

    Gary Lear, President & CEO

    Resource Development Systems LLC
    Managing the Human Side of Business (sm)

    www.ResourceDevelopmentSystems.com

    (c) 2005 permission denied to use this post in any other forum or in any way
    other than on the discussion list that it was originally posted.