Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  CFP: Case Studies in Research: Knowledge and Inquiry

    Posted 05-19-2007 12:55
    Call for Papers:

    Design Research Quarterly

    announces a new series of articles:

    Case Studies in Research: Knowledge and Inquiry

    'we want to hold a discussion
    on how research steers theory'

    Call for Papers:

    Designers use the term 'design' to cover a wide range of
    activities and types of problems, and we have many differing,
    often incommensurable and opposing models of
    design and its theoretical and methodological bases. As a
    result, we also have have a history of lively debates over specific
    theories. These debates have not been able to resolve
    differences.

    Many regions of design are not well defined, and in such
    situations, researchers can find that apparently straightforward
    problems can lead to fundamental questions about the
    nature of design, what kinds of philosophical and theoretical
    positions that can frame the research and ground the methods,
    and their implications with regard to knowledge: what
    kinds of knowledge are possible within the frames needed
    to do the research.

    In short, we want to hold a discussion on how research
    steers theory. Our idea is to look at research and theories in
    design not primarily as related to subfields per se, but to see
    theories as products of research problems themselves: the
    topics studied studied and the questions being researched.
    Rather than look at abstract problems of research and
    theory, we want to present actual problems as case studies.
    In this way, we can clarify design by mapping its terrain
    of activities and problem types with their fundamental theoretical
    and methodological requirements.

    Over the next two years, DRQ will collect and publish
    articles on these topics and replies to those articles, using
    its regular publication schedule to build a discussion. If you
    have an interest or idea for an article or other submission,
    please contact the editor, Peter Storkerson.

    --

    Topics:

    We seek papers that explore issues including:

    - ontological and epistemological implications or require-
    ments of a research problem

    - status of knowledge, its bases and levels of certainty

    - conflicts between the knowledge that is possible in a
    given situation and the research goals.

    -how research fits into fundamental paradigms: scien-
    tific, humanist, phenomenological, pragmatic, etc., and
    how those approaches compare in their strengths and
    weaknesses

    - working across the boundaries of humanism and science:
    the extent to which a research problem requires use
    of more than one basic philosophical frame and how different
    frames can be reconciled

    Specifications:

    3,ooo to 6,000 words

    APA guidelines

    --

    Design Research Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal
    published by the Design Research Society.

    --

    For information or submissions:

    Peter Storkerson email: peter@drsq.org



  • 2.  CFP: Case Studies in Research: Knowledge and Inquiry

    Posted 07-20-2007 00:55
    Friends,

    The new issues of Design Research Quarterly is about to appear.
    This issue features an important article by Linda Drew titled
    "Designing the Interface Between Research, Learning and Teaching."

    DRQ is both a quarterly peer-reviewed journal and a membership
    bulletin distributed to members of the Design Research Society.

    The editor -- Dr. Peter Storkerson -- is developing an exciting new
    series of articles for which we now seek submissions.

    Best regards,

    Ken Friedman
    Editorial Advisory Board (Chair)
    Design Research Quarterly

    --

    Call for Papers:

    Design Research Quarterly

    announces a new series of articles:

    Case Studies in Research: Knowledge and Inquiry

    'we want to hold a discussion
    on how research steers theory'

    Call for Papers:

    Designers use the term 'design' to cover a wide range of
    activities and types of problems, and we have many differing,
    often incommensurable and opposing models of
    design and its theoretical and methodological bases. As a
    result, we also have have a history of lively debates over specific
    theories. These debates have not been able to resolve
    differences.

    Many regions of design are not well defined, and in such
    situations, researchers can find that apparently straightforward
    problems can lead to fundamental questions about the
    nature of design, what kinds of philosophical and theoretical
    positions that can frame the research and ground the methods,
    and their implications with regard to knowledge: what
    kinds of knowledge are possible within the frames needed
    to do the research.

    In short, we want to hold a discussion on how research
    steers theory. Our idea is to look at research and theories in
    design not primarily as related to subfields per se, but to see
    theories as products of research problems themselves: the
    topics studied studied and the questions being researched.
    Rather than look at abstract problems of research and
    theory, we want to present actual problems as case studies.
    In this way, we can clarify design by mapping its terrain
    of activities and problem types with their fundamental theoretical
    and methodological requirements.

    Over the next two years, DRQ will collect and publish
    articles on these topics and replies to those articles, using
    its regular publication schedule to build a discussion. If you
    have an interest or idea for an article or other submission,
    please contact the editor, Peter Storkerson.

    --

    Topics:

    We seek papers that explore issues including:

    - ontological and epistemological implications or require-
    ments of a research problem

    - status of knowledge, its bases and levels of certainty

    - conflicts between the knowledge that is possible in a
    given situation and the research goals.

    -how research fits into fundamental paradigms: scien-
    tific, humanist, phenomenological, pragmatic, etc., and
    how those approaches compare in their strengths and
    weaknesses

    - working across the boundaries of humanism and science:
    the extent to which a research problem requires use
    of more than one basic philosophical frame and how different
    frames can be reconciled

    Specifications:

    3,ooo to 6,000 words

    APA guidelines

    --

    Design Research Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal
    published by the Design Research Society.

    --

    For information or submissions:

    Peter Storkerson email: peter@drsq.org